Eastern Europe fears where the shadow of Crimea will fall next

Ukrainian border guards stand at a checkpoint at the border with Moldova breakaway Transnistria region, near Odessa March 13, 2014. (REUTERS/Yevgeny Volokin)

BUCHAREST: Broken promises of help from the West; a tragic history of Russian invasion that goes back centuries; a painful awareness that conflicts in this volatile region are contagious. These are the factors that make nations across Eastern Europe watch events in Ukraine and tremble. From leaders to the public, there is a palpable sense of fear that Russia, seemingly able to thumb its nose at Western powers at will, may seek further opportunities for incursions in its former imperial backyard. The question many people are asking is: who’s next?

“There is first of all fear ... that there could be a possible contagion,” Romanian Foreign Minister Titus Corlatean told the Associated Press in an interview. “Romania is extremely preoccupied.”

Specifically, concerns run high that after taking over the strategic peninsula of Crimea, Russian President Vladimir Putin may be tempted to try a land grab in Moldova, where Russian troops are stationed in the breakaway province of Trans-Dniester. It is one of several “frozen conflicts” across Eastern Europe, a list to which many in the West have now added Crimea.

In Romania, which neighbors predominantly Romanian-speaking Moldova, writer and activist Monica Nistorescu urged the West to stand up to Putin before he comes to view himself as unbeatable.

“The world should stop seeing Putin as the invincible dragon with silver teeth,” she said, “because we will succeed in making him believe that Russia is what it once was.”

Across the border, a Moldovan voiced fears of Russian invasion. “We are afraid the conflict in Ukraine could reach us in Moldova,” said Victor Cotruta, a clerk in the capital Chisinau. “Russian troops could take over Moldova in a day.”

Many in the region are keenly aware that Poland received unsubstantiated guarantees of help from France and Britain against Nazi aggression. That history feeds skepticism that NATO would come to the aid of eastern member nations in the event of a Russian attack.

“Poland’s history shows that we should not count on others,” novelist Jaroslaw Szulski told AP.

Such feelings are particularly acute in the Baltic nations that are members of NATO and the EU. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania have sizable Russian populations that Moscow periodically declares it needs to “protect” – the word Putin used in justifying his invasion of Crimea.

“I’m a bit skeptical,” Tiina Seeman said in Tallinn, Estonia, when asked if she believed the West would come to her nation’s rescue. “I’d like to believe so but I can’t say I trust them 100 percent.”

Moscow routinely accuses Estonia and Latvia of discriminating against their Russian-speaking minority populations.

Tensions between Russia and Estonia soared in 2007, when protests by Russian-speakers against the relocation of a Soviet-era war monument culminated in street riots. Many Estonians blamed Moscow – which has handed out passports to ethnic Russians in the Baltics – for stirring up the protests.

As she arrived at an EU emergency summit on Ukraine last week, Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite expressed more confidence than Seeman in the U.S.-led security alliance: “Thank God! Thank God that we are already 10 years in NATO!”

But she too expressed grave concerns about Russia’s actions: “Russia today is trying to rewrite the borders in Europe after World War II.”

History weighs heavily in Eastern European minds as they contemplate the future. Many people see Russia’s seizure of Crimea as similar to their experiences after World War II, when Soviet troops rolled through towns and villages, effectively putting them under the Kremlin’s rule for decades.

“Of course there’s a potential threat for us in the future,” Katerina Zapadlova, a waitress in a Prague cafe, said with a bitter smile. She recalled how Soviet troops rolled into Czechoslovakia in 1968 to crush the Prague Spring liberalization movement.

“I’m afraid. It’s because of what they did to us in the past.”

Some experts say those fears are overblown, however.

“I wouldn’t be afraid of Russian aggression in a short term,” said Michal Koran, of Prague’s Institute of International Relations. “I’m 100 percent sure [that NATO would help its eastern allies]. I think that NATO gets stronger as a result of the conflict in Ukraine.”

Mutual economic dependence also lowers the likelihood of an armed conflict between Russia and the West. Russia’s economy runs largely on the massive amounts of natural gas it supplies to Europe every year, and in 2012 it bought $170 billion in European machinery, cars and other exports.

But the reliance of both Eastern and Western European nations on Russian energy also gives the West fewer options in taking a hard line against Moscow.

Romania’s foreign minister said that NATO has taken positive action in dealing with the Ukraine crisis, citing the dispatch of AWACS reconnaissance planes to fly over Poland and Romania to monitor the crisis.

“The measure taken by the North Atlantic Council aims ... to prevent tensions at a regional level and to guarantee the security of state members,” Corlatean told AP.

Yet he could not refrain from expressing historical fears, evoking the bloodbath that resulted when dictator Nicolae Ceausescu ordered troops to fire on protesters in the dying days of his regime.

“Romanians followed very closely everything that happened in these weeks, especially the dramatic events in Kiev,” said Corlatean. “For us Romanians, this reminded us of the December 1989 revolution.”

Some countries, including Poland, which shares a border with both Ukraine and Russia, are already starting to take precautionary measures. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk has warned that instability in Ukraine may be prolonged and could lead Warsaw to upgrade its weapons. At the Polish government’s request, about 300 U.S. airmen and a dozen F-16 fighters arrived in Poland this week for a military exercise.

Tusk alluded to Europe’s appeasement of Hitler and Stalin in the 1930s as he warned about the implications of letting Russia get away with its takeover of Crimea.

“Anyone who believes that peace and stabilization can be bought through concessions is mistaken,” Tusk said last week in parliament.

“Europe has made such mistakes, and they always led to a catastrophe,” he added.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on March 15, 2014, on page 9.




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here