Rai receives a delegation from Hezbollah in Bkirki. (The Daily Star/Maronite Patriarchate Bkerke, HO)
Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Sharp differences emerged Friday during a meeting between a Hezbollah delegation and Maronite Patriarch Beshara Rai after the party said it was adamant on backing MP Michel Aoun for the presidency, rejecting any alternative candidate, according to Bkirki sources.Speaking to reporters after the meeting, Sayyed said Aoun, the head of the Free Patriotic Movement, remained Hezbollah's sole candidate for president.In response to Hezbollah's unyielding support for Aoun, Rai cited during the meeting three priorities which he said could help break the presidential deadlock: Either all candidates, including Aoun and Geagea, go down to Parliament to seek lawmakers' support, or let Aoun and Geagea withdraw from the presidency race, or let the FPM and LF leaders agree on a consensus candidate, a source who participated in the Bkirki meeting told The Daily Star.Rai told the Hezbollah delegation that if Aoun won the votes of 57 to 60 lawmakers during the election session, he pledged to seek to obtain the votes of additional lawmakers in order to secure a majority for the FPM leader, the source added.
Hariri upbeat on forming govt within a week: Berri
Berri-FPM tension over summit casts gloom over Cabinet formation
Is Lebanon headed toward more sectarianism?
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE