Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Following the Special Tribunal for Lebanon's summer hiatus, prosecution analyst Andrew Donaldson compared call records during a hajj pilgrimage by Salim Ayyash in 2004 and an alleged pilgrimage he took in 2005 during the return session Tuesday.However, when comparing Ayyash's 2005 hajj phone records to those between Jan. 16 and Jan 25, 2005 – the dates of the suspect's alleged trip to Saudi Arabia – Donaldson claimed that it did not tally with the previous year.Incongruent call records between Ayyash 2004 Hajj pilgrimage and his alleged 2005 pilgrimage are part of the prosecution's case that the indicted suspect had in fact not gone to Saudi Arabia despite previous plans and booking the visit.Throughout Tuesday's session, Prosecution Counsel Marc Desalliers attempted to make the case through call records that Ayyash had indeed stayed in Lebanon.
Lebanese decry lack of visa reciprocity
Venezuelan community hopes for better days
Where are Burj Hammoud’s artisans?
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE