Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Defense counselor Vincent Courcelle-Labrousse contested Friday the legitimacy of evidence used by expert witness Gary Platt as well as the accuracy of his former testimonies at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon.Courcelle-Labrousse, who represents the interests of Oneissi, continued working to poke holes in Platt's testimony during his third day of cross-examination.The five defendants accused of orchestrating the 2005 Beirut bombing that killed former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri and 21 others are currently being tried in absentia, making cellular evidence critical for both the defense and prosecution's cases.The defense counselor was also highly critical of Platt's strategies while he was working as an investigator on the case.
Religious courts, international law clash in custody case
Lebanon’s elderly deeply vulnerable
Tracy or Miriam: Where do Lebanon’s storms get their names?
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE