Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The attribution of cell phones to indicted suspects in the 2005 assassination of former Prime Minister Rafik Hariri was the central focus of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon Tuesday.The defense criticized Donaldson's failure to define his own role once the decision was made in 2012 that he would be used as an attribution witness. Donaldson produced numerous reports for the prosecution during that time, but failed to address how he defined "attribution," drawing criticism from both the counsel for the defense, and the trial judges. Emphasizing the importance of cellphone data to the case, Trial Chamber President Judge David Re followed up the point.Donaldson agreed with the defense counsel that cellphone data attribution was not an exact science.
Anti-Syrian rhetoric not just Lebanese phenomenon
HRW warns Burj Hammoud landfill near capacity, advocates sorting at source
Cedars boycott averted after legal threat
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE