Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Testimony provided by former prosecution investigator Quentin Mugg to the Special Tribunal for Lebanon trial chamber Thursday focused on allegations of shortcomings in the STL's investigative phase.Despite having led a small investigation team, the defense said Mugg failed to flag and investigate contradictory statements made by two witnesses, identified as PRH 056 and a relative.PRH 056 was interviewed by Mugg, subsequently submitting a formal statement about Abou Adass. When Defense Counsel Geoff Roberts questioned Mugg as to whether he knew about the contradicting statements at the time he submitted this testimony, Mugg replied that he did not recall.The defense asked whether the former investigator had found PRH 056's story to be consistent when the witness submitted the statement.
Lebanese decry lack of visa reciprocity
Venezuelan community hopes for better days
Where are Burj Hammoud’s artisans?
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE