LUXEMBOURG/WILLIAMSBURG, Virginia: European Union governments agreed on further sanctions against Iran’s banking, shipping and industrial sectors Monday, cranking up financial pressure on Tehran in the hope of drawing it into serious negotiations on its nuclear program.
The decision by EU foreign ministers reflected mounting concerns over Iran’s nuclear intentions and Israeli threats to attack Iranian atomic installations if a mix of sanctions and diplomacy fails to lead to a peaceful solution.
EU Foreign Policy Chief Catherine Ashton said she hoped that turning up the heat on the Islamic Republic would persuade Tehran to make concessions and that negotiations could resume “very soon.”
“I absolutely do think there is room for negotiations,” said Ashton, who represents the United States, China, Russia, Britain, France and Germany in their on-and-off talks with Iran. “I hope we will be able to make progress very soon.”
The new sanctions mark one of the EU’s toughest moves against Iran to date and a significant change of policy for the 27-member bloc, which has hitherto focused largely on targeting specific people and companies with economic restrictions.
The EU has lagged the United States in imposing blanket industry bans because it is concerned not to punish ordinary Iranian citizens while inflicting pain on the Tehran government.
Iran maintains that its nuclear project has only peaceful energy purposes and has refused in three rounds of talks since April to scale back its uranium enrichment activity unless major economic sanctions are rescinded.
But governments in Europe and the United States, doubting Iran’s preparedness for more than dilatory “talks about talks,” are instead tightening the financial screws on Tehran and fears of a descent into a new Middle East war are growing.
German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle was more pessimistic than Ashton about the prospect that additional economic pain might drive Tehran – whose Islamic Revolution has long thrived on defiance of the West – to make concessions.
“Iran is still playing for time,” he told reporters. “We don’t see a sufficient readiness for substantial talks about the nuclear program.”
But Washington welcomed the sanctions, saying they deepened the Islamic Republic’s isolation.
White House spokesman Jay Carney said Washington welcomed the adoption of the new European sanctions “in response to the Iranian government’s continued violation of its international obligations regarding its nuclear program.”
“This action ... further strengthens international efforts to pressure and isolate the Iranian government,” Carney added.
The widening sanctions regime is already doing significant damage to the Iranian economy, notably due to an oil embargo imposed by the European Union this year and new financial sanctions applied by the United States.
Riots have broken out in Tehran this month in protest at the collapse of the rial currency, which has lost some two-thirds of its value in the past 15 months, stoking inflation that is now running at around 25 percent.
The new European measures include a general ban on financial transactions, with some exceptions for those involving humanitarian aid and provisions for legitimate trade.
Reversing existing policy, the ban will require European traders to ask governments for authorization before they can finance transactions in permitted goods. Previously, the EU broadly allowed trade unless goods were specifically banned.
“The EU’s ban on financial transactions moves the Europeans to a more effective approach,” Mark Dubowitz of the Washington-based Foundation for the Defense of Democracies said.
Trade will be hampered further by a new ban on European governments extending short-term trade guarantees, and by tougher restrictions on dealings with the Iranian central bank.
Other new measures include a ban on importing Iranian gas to Europe or providing any financing or transport of gas sales, as well as a prohibition on exporting graphite – used in steel-making – and metals to the Islamic Republic.
European companies will also be banned from providing storage or transport vessels for Iranian crude or petrochemical products, and from supporting Iranian ship-building.
At the core of Iran’s dispute with world powers is its insistence that it has a right to enrich uranium and that economic sanctions should be lifted before it stops activities that could help it to achieve the capability to produce nuclear weapons.