Mobile  |  About us  |  Photos  |  Videos  |  Subscriptions  |  RSS Feeds  |  Today's Paper  |  Classifieds  |  Contact Us
Advanced Search
The Daily Star
THURSDAY, 23 MAY 2013
12:31 AM Beirut time
Weather    
Beirut
23 °C
Blom Index
BLOM
1,211.5down
Middle East
Follow this story Print Email this RSS Feed ePaper share this
Panetta defends military response in Libya attack
Associated Press
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and testifies on the attack on the US facilities in Benghazi, Libya, before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2013. AFP PHOTO / Saul LOEB
US Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and testifies on the attack on the US facilities in Benghazi, Libya, before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, on February 7, 2013. AFP PHOTO / Saul LOEB
A+ A-

WASHINGTON: Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that the speed of the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, kept U.S. armed forces from responding in time to save the four Americans who were killed as the Pentagon chief defended the military's response on a chaotic Sept. 11 day.

Testifying for likely the last time on Capitol Hill before stepping down, Panetta said the Obama administration was trying to assess the threat from protests in Tunisia, Egypt, the Libyan capital of Tripoli and other countries while trying to move quickly to respond to two separate assaults six hours apart in Benghazi.

The positioning of military teams far from the U.S. installation made it difficult to respond swiftly, he said. The assault claimed the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

"The United States military is not and should not be a global 911 service capable of arriving on the scene within minutes to every possible contingency around the world," Panetta told the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Committee Republicans used the hearing to highlight their months of repeated criticism of President Barack Obama and the administration, claiming officials ignored warnings and even suggesting that the commander in chief was disengaged from what was happening during the hours of the two attacks.

Army Gen. Martin Dempsey echoed the argument that the military did what its location allowed, which angered Sen. John McCain, a Republican who accused the Joint Chiefs of Staff chairman of peddling falsehoods.

"For you to testify that our posture did not allow a rapid response, did not take into account threats to our consulate ... is simply false," McCain told Dempsey. McCain contended that the military's capability allowed armed forces to intervene in short order.

Dempsey said he stood by his testimony, "your dispute of it notwithstanding." The general said the military was concerned with multiple threats worldwide and, based on time and positioning of forces, "we wouldn't have gotten there in time."

Between midnight and 2 a.m. on the night of the attack, Panetta issued orders, telling two Marine anti-terrorism teams based in Rota, Spain, to prepare to deploy to Libya, and he ordered a team of special operations forces in Central Europe and another team of special operations forces in the U.S. to prepare to deploy to a staging base in Europe.

The first of those U.S. military units did not actually arrive in the region until well after the attack was over and Americans had been flown out of the country. Just before 8 p.m., the special operations team landed at Sigonella Naval Air Station in Sicily. An hour later, the Marine team landed in Tripoli. Defense officials have repeatedly said that even if the military had been able to get units there a bit faster, there was no way they could have gotten there in time to make any difference in the deaths of the four Americans.

"This was, pure and simple, a problem of distance and time," Panetta said.

Panetta said he and Dempsey were meeting with Obama when they learned for the Libya assault. He said the president told them to deploy forces as quickly as possible.

In one testy exchange, Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican, questioned whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting. The

Pentagon chief said no but that the White House was in touch with military officials and aware of what was happening.

"During the eight-hour period, did he show any curiosity?" Graham asked.

Panetta said there was no question the president was concerned about American lives. Exasperated with Graham's interruptions, Panetta said forcefully, "The president is well-informed about what is going on; make no mistake about it."

Panetta also pushed back against Republican criticism that the Obama administration ignored warning signs about the attack. The Pentagon

chief insisted there were no signs of or specific intelligence about an imminent attack. Six months prior to the assault, the government was apprised of 281 threats to diplomatic missions, consulates and other facilities worldwide, he said.

He answered emerging questions about why the U.S. didn't send more firepower, such as helicopter gunships or fixed-wing fighter jets. He said those were not in the vicinity and would have required at least nine to 12 hours to deploy. Even if aircraft could have arrived quickly, the chaos would have prevented them from getting the accurate information they needed to hit the right targets, he said.

Sen. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican, pressed Dempsey on why F-16 jets in Aviano, Italy, weren't sent to Libya. Dempsey said it would have taken up to 20 hours to get the planes ready and on their way, and he added that they would have been the "wrong tool for the job."

Dempsey reminded the committee that it was "9/11 everywhere" when the consulate was attacked and that U.S. armed forces were prepared to respond to a wide variety of threats around the world.

U.S. posts and facilities in many countries throughout Africa and southwest Asia were operating under heightened protection levels, he said. "We positioned our forces in a way that was informed by and consistent with available threat estimates," Dempsey said.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Republican, asked whether Panetta and Dempsey would describe the Benghazi incident as an "intelligence failure."

Panetta stopped short of using that term, saying simply that "some of the initial assessments were not on the money." Dempsey called it an "intelligence gap."

Sen. James Inhofe, the committee's top Republican, wasted little time in criticizing the administration for trying to "cover up" what he said was clearly a terrorist attack. The U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice, initially attributed the violence to a protest against an American-made, anti-Islam video.

Rice's comments touched off a deeply partisan feud, with Republicans claiming the Obama White House wanted to obscure the reasons for the incident to help the president's re-election bid. The criticism of Rice was largely responsible for scuttling her chances to become secretary of state.

 
Home Middle East
 
     
 
United States of America
Advertisement
Around the Web
Comments  

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

comments powered by Disqus
Story Summary
Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Thursday that the speed of the attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, kept U.S. armed forces from responding in time to save the four Americans who were killed as the Pentagon chief defended the military's response on a chaotic Sept. 11 day.

The assault claimed the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans.

The first of those U.S. military units did not actually arrive in the region until well after the attack was over and Americans had been flown out of the country.

In one testy exchange, Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican, questioned whether Panetta spoke again to Obama after that first meeting.

Panetta also pushed back against Republican criticism that the Obama administration ignored warning signs about the attack.

Sen. Saxby Chambliss, a Republican, asked whether Panetta and Dempsey would describe the Benghazi incident as an "intelligence failure".

Dempsey called it an "intelligence gap".
Related Articles
 
 
US general: Taliban likely to be long-term threat
 
 
US forces in Europe on alert due to Libya unrest
 
 
Diplomat: US team stopped from going to Benghazi
 
 
FBI names Benghazi suspects _ but no arrests yet
 
 
US diplomatic security back in focus at Benghazi hearing
Show More
Entities
Advertisement
Most Popular
Viewed Searched e-mailed
1. Heavy clashes batter north Lebanon's Tripoli
 
2. A Hezbollah turning point in Qusair?
 
3. Syrian rebels put up fierce resistance in Qusair
 
4. Burial of Hezbollah fighter sparks tension in Sidon
 
5. Tripoli braces for the worst as fighting enters fourth day
 
6. Residents of Baalbek back Hezbollah
Advertisement
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Linked In Follow us on Google+ Subscribe to our Live Feed
Multimedia
Images  
Pictures of the day
A selection of images from around the world- Wednesday May 22, 2013
View all view all
Advertisement
Rami G. Khouri
Rami G. Khouri
A Hezbollah turning point in Qusair?
Michael Young
Michael Young
Washington blunders yet again in Syria
David Ignatius
David Ignatius
The Benghazi emails expose Washington’s dysfunctions
View all view all
Advertisement
cartoon
 
Click to View Articles
 
 
News
Business
Opinion
Sports
Culture
Technology
Entertainment
Privacy Policy | Anti-Spamming Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice
© 2013 The Daily Star - All Rights Reserved - Designed and Developed By IDS