VIENNA: The U.N. nuclear watchdog appears to have made only limited progress so far in getting Iran to answer questions about its suspected atomic bomb research, diplomatic sources said Friday, three days before a deadline for cooperation.
Under an accord reached by the U.N. agency and Iran in November in an attempt to revive the long-stalled investigation, Tehran agreed in May to carry out five specific steps by Aug. 25 to help allay international concerns.
They include providing information about two issues – including alleged explosives experimentation – that are part of the inquiry by the International Atomic Energy Agency into what it calls the possible military dimensions of Iran’s nuclear program, which Tehran says is peaceful.
The diplomatic sources said Iran and the IAEA may have begun discussing the two topics, but they did not believe Tehran had provided the requested information or explanations yet.
They said there was still time for Iran to implement the required measures, noting that it had occasionally waited until the last minute to make concessions in the past.
But slow-paced cooperation tends to reinforce Western impressions that Iran is reluctant to give the IAEA the information and access to sites and people that the IAEA says it needs for its investigation.
There was no immediate comment from the IAEA or Iran.
Iran denies the nuclear program has any military objectives, but since Hassan Rouhani was elected Iranian president in mid-2013, it has promised to work with the IAEA to resolve any concerns.
Western officials say it is crucial for Iran to address the suspicions for there to be a successful outcome of the talks on a diplomatic settlement between Iran and the United States, France, Germany, Britain, China and Russia.
IAEA Director General Yukiya Amano said after he held talks in Tehran on Sunday that implementation of the five steps had begun and that he expected progress to be made over the coming week, but he did not give details.
Speaking after talks with Rouhani and other senior officials, he said he had received a “firm commitment” by Iran to cooperate with the long-running investigation. He also said he hoped for an agreement soon on future steps by Iran.
Amano’s trip to Tehran was an apparent attempt to push for progress, after diplomatic sources in July said that the IAEA was concerned about Iran’s lack of engagement with the probe.
After years of what the West saw as Iranian stonewalling, Iran as a first step in May gave the IAEA information it had requested about Tehran’s reasons for developing exploding bridge wire detonators, which can be used to set off atomic explosive devices. Iran says they are for civilian use.
The two issues in the inquiry that Iran agreed to address by late August concern alleged experiments on explosives that could be used for an atomic device and studies related to calculating nuclear explosive yields.
They were among 12 specific areas listed in an IAEA report issued in 2011 with a trove of intelligence indicating a concerted weapons program that was halted in 2003, when Iran came under increased international pressure.
The intelligence also suggested that some activities might later have been resumed.