BEIRUT

Middle East

Australia refuses to call East Jerusalem 'occupied'

  • Israeli police detain a Palestinian protester during a rally marking "Naksa Day", the 47th anniversary of the 1967 War, at Damascus Gate in Arab East Jerusalem on June 5, 2014. AFP PHOTO / AHMAD GHARABLI

SYDNEY: Australia has decided to remove the term "occupied" when referring to East Jerusalem in a move blasted by an opposition party leader Friday as "inflammatory" and "at odds with the peace process."

The issue flared in the upper house Senate this week with Attorney-General George Brandis issuing a statement to clarify Canberra's stance on the controversial question of the legality of settler homes.

"The description of areas which are the subject of negotiations in the course of the peace process by reference to historical events is unhelpful," he said in the statement Thursday.

"The description of East Jerusalem as 'occupied' East Jerusalem is a term freighted with pejorative implications which is neither appropriate nor useful.

"It should not and will not be the practice of the Australian government to describe areas of negotiation in such judgmental language."

He added that Canberra supported a peaceful solution to the dispute "which recognizes the right of Israel to exist peacefully within secure borders and also recognises the aspiration to statehood of the Palestinian people."

Israel's army seized the West Bank, including Arab East Jerusalem, in the 1967 war.

It later annexed the entire eastern sector, in a move that has never been recognized by the international community.

Brandis sparked a heated debate Wednesday evening in the Senate when he stated that no Australian government of either political persuasion "acknowledges or accepts" the use of the word "occupied."

A number of senators disagreed, pointing out that Australia had voted in support of U.N. resolutions in 2011 and 2012 where such language was used to describe the East Jerusalem settlements.

Independent Senator Nick Xenophon suggested that dropping the term "occupied" would represent a "massive shift" in Australia's foreign policy, Australian Associated Press reported.

The leader of the Australian Greens Christine Milne Friday called it "an outrageous backdown" by the Tony Abbott-led government.

"It is inflammatory behavior and at odds with the peace process," she said in a statement.

"The use of the term 'Occupied Palestinian Territories' is the accepted term used by the U.N.

"The Israeli settlements built after 1967 are illegal. The settlements contravene the Fourth Geneva Convention."

 
Advertisement

Comments

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

comments powered by Disqus
Summary

Australia has decided to remove the term "occupied" when referring to East Jerusalem in a move blasted by an opposition party leader Friday as "inflammatory" and "at odds with the peace process".

The issue flared in the upper house Senate this week with Attorney-General George Brandis issuing a statement to clarify Canberra's stance on the controversial question of the legality of settler homes.

A number of senators disagreed, pointing out that Australia had voted in support of U.N. resolutions in 2011 and 2012 where such language was used to describe the East Jerusalem settlements.


Advertisement

FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE

Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here