Middle East

Russia slams US 'failure' in Iraq ahead of UN Security Council talks

Iraqi refugees from Mosul arrive at Khazir refugee camp outside Irbil, 350 kilometers north of Baghdad, Iraq, Wednesday, June. 11, 2014. (AP Photo)

WASHINGTON/MOSCOW: Russia slammed U.S. failures in Iraq Thursday as the Security Council prepared for crisis talks on a major jihadist insurgency that was heading toward Baghdad.

Rebels from an Al-Qaeda splinter group overran the Iraqi city of Tikrit Wednesday and closed in on the biggest oil refinery in the country, making further gains in their rapid military advance against the Shiite-led government in Baghdad.

Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that the spectacular seizure of Iraqi cities by advancing jihadist fighters was a clear sign of the "total failure" of the US-led invasion.

“This is an illustration of the complete failure of the adventure that was started by the US and the UK and has now spiraled out of control completely,” Lavrov said.

“We express our solidarity with the Iraqi authorities, the Iraqi people who should restore peace and security in their country, but the actions of our Western partners raise a lot of questions,” Lavrov marked.

The UN Security Council has called for emergency talks, with diplomats saying closed consultations will begin at 11:30 am (1530 GMT) Thursday.

Iraq's ambassador to France called on the Security Council to approve extra military aid for Baghdad, including air and drone support.

"We need equipment, extra aviation and drones," Fareed Yasseen said, when asked on France Inter radio what Iraq wanted from the Council.

The White House, meanwhile, signaled that it was looking to strengthen Iraqi forces to help them deal with an insurgency rather than to meet what one U.S. official said were past Iraqi requests for U.S. airstrikes.

An Obama administration official who spoke on condition of anonymity said Iraq had previously made clear its interest in drone strikes or bombing by manned U.S. aircraft to help it beat back the militant onslaught.

Sunni rebels from an Al-Qaeda splinter group overran the Iraqi city of Tikrit on Wednesday and closed in on the biggest oil refinery in the country, making further gains in their rapid military advance against the Shiite-led government in Baghdad.

The threat to the Baiji refinery came after militants from the Islamic State in Iraq and Greater Syria, or ISIS, seized the northern city of Mosul, advancing their aim of creating a Sunni caliphate straddling the border between Iraq and Syria.

The White House has suggested that airstrikes were not at the top of its agenda as it considers what it may do to help the Iraqi government against an insurgency that has drawn strength from the civil war in neighboring Syria.

"While the national security team always looks at a range of options, the current focus of our discussions with the government of Iraq and our policy considerations is to build the capacity of the Iraqis to successfully confront and deal with the threat posed" by ISIS, White House national security council spokeswoman Bernadette Meehan said in an emailed comment.

The Obama administration official who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity declined to provide details on what the United States might do to help Iraq, saying only that it was "considering (a) range of requests."

The Wall Street Journal, quoting senior U.S. officials, first reported that Iraq had signaled it would let the United States strike Al-Qaeda militant targets in Iraq with manned aircraft or drones.

Separately, the New York Times reported that Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki secretly asked the Obama administration to consider airstrikes against militant staging areas as the threat from Sunni insurgents mounted last month.

An Iraqi official told Reuters that Iraq wanted U.S. airstrikes but believed the Obama administration was not interested in getting involved.

The official said such strikes would be covered under the strategic framework agreement signed by the United States and Iraq in 2008. Within this, limited U.S. forces could operate on the ground to carry out such strikes, he added.

But the official said he did not think the Americans had any interest in such a deepened commitment.

The Times quoted American experts who visited Baghdad this year as saying they were told that Iraqi leaders hoped American air power could be used to hit militant staging and training areas inside Iraq, and help Iraq's forces stop them from crossing into the country from Syria.

The White House declined to confirm either newspaper report.

"We are not going to get into details of our diplomatic discussions but the government of Iraq has made clear that they welcome our support" against the militants, Meehan said in a separate statement.

"We have expedited shipments of military equipment since the beginning of the year, ramped up training of Iraqi Security Forces, and worked intensively to help Iraq implement a holistic approach to counter this terrorist threat," she added. "Our assistance has been comprehensive, is continuing and will increase."

The fall of Mosul, Iraq's second-biggest city, is a blow to attempts to defeat the militants, who have seized territory in Iraq over the past year following the withdrawal of U.S. forces.

A former U.S. official, who worked on Iraq issues, said the Obama administration viewed Iraq as a dispute that did not affect the United States directly and that Washington should steer clear of entangling itself in it directly.

Another U.S. official who spoke to Reuters on condition of anonymity questioned the utility of drones, saying it might not be possible to deploy them effectively in time to stem the current crisis in Iraq.

"What does it require to have drones come to a country? It requires a very, very high level of intel capability and expertise. So you can't just send drones on an airplane and have them land and have them work," said this official.

"They wouldn't have, in this sort of period of time, the ability, given what is going on here, to field the drones (effectively)," he added. "I believe it would take longer than the current crisis (may require)."

This official said that once militants had taken control of cities, it would require "incredibly intense fighting" on the ground to dislodge them.



Related Articles




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here