Middle East

Another deal, but South Sudan still far from peace

South Sudan's soldiers sit on a truck at the airport in Juba on June 12, 2014. AFP PHOTO / SAMIR BOL

NAIROBI: South Sudan’s warring leaders have agreed another deal aimed at ending six months of civil war but even if this one holds, analysts expect violence to get worse before the situation can improve.

After several failed deals, many are skeptical that either President Salva Kiir or his arch-rival Riek Machar really want a negotiated end to the conflict, and instead believe a military victory is still possible.

“This agreement was signed under great pressure, including from the region, but it will only stick if both Kiir and Machar perceive it to be in their best interests,” said James Copnall, author of a recent book on South Sudan, “A Poisonous Thorn in our Hearts.”

“The evidence of the last few months, during which both the government and the rebels have frequently broken the cessation of hostilities agreements they had signed, suggests it would be unwise to be too optimistic.”

War in the young nation has killed thousands and forced more than 1.3 million people from their homes.

But even if negotiations progress, some fear it will create further violence, as leaders jostle for power in a proposed transitional government for which the enemies agreed a 60-day deadline to settle.

“Political movement forward is critical but there will be a fallout on the ground as well,” said Casie Copeland from the International Crisis Group (ICG).

“There are concerns as negotiations progress toward a transitional government, that it will create extra instability on the ground, as each side seeks to weaken the other and shore up their own base,” she said.

After heavy battles early in the year, when major towns were razed as they switched hands several times between government forces and rebels, the conflict appears to be settling down into a miserable low-level civil war.

“The last few months have shown how little either side cares for international rules of warfare, or for civilian lives,” said Copnall.

“More conflict will mean more rapes, more murders, thousands more pushed toward starvation,” he added.

Talks held in Addis Ababa have been repeatedly delayed, and sources said both sides openly scoffed that the 60-day deadline would be met.

The cost of talks has spiraled to over 17 million dollars (12 million euros), according to mediators.

They have offered some of their toughest warnings yet, although past threats of sanctions have had little if any impact.

Forming a transitional government would require enemies responsible for what the U.N. fears could be crimes against humanity – including massacres and mass rape – to now share power.

Human Rights Watch warned that “peace without justice often fosters renewed cycles of violence,” demanding that no amnesty be offered.

Pressure may be put upon both Kiir and Machar to step aside, at least until elections.

“It is difficult to imagine how South Sudan can be peaceful with either Kiir or Machar at or near the heart of power,” Copnall said, admitting that “neither man is likely to agree to give up his ambitions.”

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on June 13, 2014, on page 10.




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here