Middle East

U.S. joins enemies old and new to face ISIS

Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal, 2nd left, United Arab Emirates Foreign Minister Abdullah Bin Zayed, 3rd left, and US Secretary of State John Kerry, 4th left, meet with staff members on the terrace of the US Chief of Mission Residence in Paris, France. (AP Photo/Brendan Smialowski, pool)

WASHINGTON: The Obama administration has found itself in a foreign policy dilemma of rare complexity, with the apparent entry of Syria into the Iraq conflict on the side of the U.S.-backed government in Baghdad as well as active Iranian military support for Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki.

Washington already was toeing a delicate line with Iran, which the U.S. deems the world’s most active state sponsor of terrorism, over their common short-term interest in turning back the advance of militant Sunni rebels in Iraq.

Now, to its dismay, Syrian President Bashar Assad – regarded in Washington as a pariah who should be ousted – has joined the club with what U.S. and Iraqi officials say are airstrikes against the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria (ISIS) in western Iraq, although Damascus denies the allegations.

Assad is being supported by Iran in his country’s own civil war against opposition forces, and a decision for Syria to hit ISIS on Iraqi soil is perhaps not surprising. While Maliki may not like Syrian attacks on Iraqi territory, “if it distracts the Islamic State from its trek toward Baghdad for a while, then they will welcome it,” said Robert Ford, former U.S. ambassador to Syria.

Maliki Thursday told the BBC that the Syrian strikes targeted the Syrian side of the border, across from the Iraqi town of Al-Qaim.

But as Iraq’s other immediate neighbors – Jordan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and Turkey – bolster their defenses, the new fighting threatens to unravel a byzantine balance of regional alliances and enmities that the United States long has sought to manage. The U.S. is deploying 300 special forces personnel to train and advise the Iraqi army and is conducting surveillance flights. Iran is also flying surveillance drones over Iraq in aid of Maliki’s government, and Syrian planes killed 17 people in a strike in Iraq’s mainly Sunni Anbar province Tuesday, according to U.S. and Iraqi officials.

American and Iranian officials have had some direct discussions on the matter, though the administration has ruled out the prospect of direct military cooperation or coordination with Iran.

However, amid widespread concern, notably among Sunni Arab states and Israel, about the convergence of U.S., Iranian and Syrian policies on ISIS, President Barack Obama’s national security team has scrambled to produce a consistent and coherent message to the region. Administration officials said intervention by Syria was not the way to stem the insurgents, who have taken control of several cities in northern and western Iraq.

“We’ve made it clear to everyone in the region that we don’t need anything to take place that might exacerbate the sectarian divisions that are already at a heightened level of tension,” U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said at a meeting of NATO foreign ministers in Brussels. “It’s already important that nothing take place that contributes to the extremism or could act as a flashpoint with respect to the sectarian divide.”

At the White House, spokesman Josh Earnest went further.

“The solution to the threat confronting Iraq is not the intervention of the Assad regime,” he told reporters. “In fact, it’s the Assad regime and the terrible violence that they perpetrated against their own people that allowed [ISIS] to thrive in the first place. The solution to Iraq’s security challenge does not involve militias or the murderous Assad regime, but the strengthening of the Iraqi security forces to combat threats.”

Administration officials have said repeatedly that the only way to resolve the crisis is for Iraqi leaders to come together and form a truly inclusive and representative government in which all three of the country’s main ethnic and religious groups – Sunni, Shiite and Kurd – have a voice.

Yet it remains unclear if Maliki is willing to allow such an administration to be formed, and as long as the crisis continues, Gulf Arab countries with their long and deep distrust of Iran in particular are watching Iraq with increasing concern.

Underscoring the urgency, Kerry, who traveled to Baghdad and the Kurdish city of Irbil this week, met in Paris Thursday with the foreign ministers of Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Jordan and Israel to try to ease their fears and discuss how to coordinate a response. Kerry will fly to Saudi Arabia Friday to hold similar talks with King Abdullah.

Karim Sadjipour, an Iran expert with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, said the situation in Iraq, coupled with ongoing U.S.-Iran nuclear negotiations, have produced a “bizarre dynamic” in which the United States and Saudi Arabia appear to be “allies but not friends” and the United States and Iran appear to be “friends but not allies.”

The addition of Assad to the mix is likely to further muddy the waters.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on June 27, 2014, on page 9.




Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here