BEIRUT

Middle East

Britain must prevent nationals from fighting abroad: report

File - Rebel fighters dig a trench near a front line in the northern Syrian city of Aleppo on February 27, 2014. (AFP PHOTO/ FADI AL-HALABI)

LONDON: Britain needs to take urgent action to stop citizens travelling to fight in Syria and other conflicts, a parliamentary committee said Friday, amid fears they could be radicalized there and return to carry out attacks on their homeland.

The head of the Home Affairs Committee also warned that Britain faced a “terrorist threat” as grave as at any point since the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States 13 years ago.

“The number of U.K. citizens and Westerners traveling to fight in foreign conflicts has reached alarming levels unlike anything seen in recent years,” the committee said in a report on counterterrorism.

“We require an immediate response targeted at dissuading and preventing those who wish to go to fight from going.”

Britain and other European governments have stepped up warnings in recent months that those who go to fight against the forces of President Bashar Assad in Syria could end up posing a threat to their home countries.

Security chiefs reckon that several hundred Britons have joined the Syrian conflict.

Last month, British counterterrorism police launched a campaign to help women dissuade young people in their communities from trying to go to Syria.

“Stopping British men and women going to become foreign fighters, in Syria and other theatres of conflict, and engaging with them when they return is vital to avoid endangering the security of the U.K. for many years to come,” committee chairman Keith Vaz said.

Britain has been considered a prime target for militant Islamists since the Sept. 11 attacks. Four suicide bombers killed 52 people in 2005 when they attacked London’s transport system.

Britain’s threat level is currently “substantial,” the third-highest rating of five, meaning an attack is a strong possibility, but the committee said the divergent nature of the threat made it more complex than before.

“Recent events involving Boko Haram [in Nigeria], Al-Shabaab [based in Somalia] and Al-Qaeda show that the terrorist threat to the U.K. is as grave as at any point in the past 13 years,” Vaz said.

However, the lawmakers on the committee were highly critical of Parliament’s mechanism for checking the work of Britain’s intelligence agencies following the release of documents by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden suggesting they were involved in mass surveillance programs.

The report said the current oversight by parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee was ineffective and that this impacted the agencies’ credibility.

“It is an embarrassing indictment of our system that some in the media felt compelled to publish leaked information to ensure matters were heard in parliament,” Vaz said.

The comments came a day after the chairman of the ISC, which has seen its powers beefed up in recent years, issued a robust defense of the work of both his committee and of the spies they monitored.

 
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on May 10, 2014, on page 10.

Recommended

Advertisement

Comments

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

comments powered by Disqus
Summary

The head of the Home Affairs Committee also warned that Britain faced a "terrorist threat" as grave as at any point since the Sept. 11 attacks on the United States 13 years ago.

Britain has been considered a prime target for militant Islamists since the Sept. 11 attacks.

Britain's threat level is currently "substantial," the third-highest rating of five, meaning an attack is a strong possibility, but the committee said the divergent nature of the threat made it more complex than before.

However, the lawmakers on the committee were highly critical of Parliament's mechanism for checking the work of Britain's intelligence agencies following the release of documents by former U.S. National Security Agency contractor Edward Snowden suggesting they were involved in mass surveillance programs.


Advertisement

FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE

Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here