DUBAI: Nearly a week after a cease-fire agreement that was believed to include the partial lifting of the blockade on Gaza, no restrictions have been eased, humanitarian workers and border guards say. NGOs are eager to increase aid to the Palestinian region after a 50-day Israeli bombing campaign left over 2,000 dead, thousands wounded and much of the enclave’s infrastructure in ruins, but access rules continue to present huge challenges.
While the exact terms of the cease-fire agreement, reached last week between Israel and various Palestinian factions, have not been released, it was widely reported that Israel had committed to easing its border sanctions in exchange for a cessation of hostilities, while Egypt, too, was expected to ease its blockade.
Though many of the most contentious issues were left for further negotiations due to take place in three weeks, humanitarian workers were hopeful aid and other access policies would be eased quickly.
Yet at the three main crossings – the Erez and Kerem Shalom crossings into Israel and the Rafah crossing into Egypt – the prewar policies have remained in place.
“At both Erez and Kerem Shalom for now there hasn’t been any change in the regime of allowing passage for people and goods,” said Maria Jose Torres, deputy head of office in the Occupied Palestinian Territory branch of the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.
She said the organization had hoped for more clarity on the opening up.
“We were expecting that the agreement of the cease-fire would have some kind of timeline for easing and lifting the blockade but so far we have nothing publicly. There might be something we are not aware of,” she said, referring to ongoing indirect talks between Palestinian factions and Israel.
One of the key issues is reducing the number of goods for which access is limited.
Among those that Israel restricts are fertilizers, cement, steel cables and even some fabrics. Israel defines such goods as “dual use” – meaning that while they are needed for the civilian population, they could also potentially be used by militant groups in attacks.
Wael Abu Omar, spokesperson for the authorities on the Gaza side of the Kerem Shalom crossing, also said officials had been expecting an immediate easing of restrictions and increase of traffic after the cease-fire.
But he said policies had not changed and the number of trade trucks entering daily had remained static – between 200 and 250.
“Honestly, we are going to have to wait and see what the days [ahead] hold for us. We are waiting for what has been promised but until now nothing has changed,” he said.
Fikr Shaltoot, director of programs in Gaza for the U.K.-based Medical Aid for the Palestinians, said they too had been disappointed by the lack of change.
“We were hoping to see immediate change on all the crossings. So far I don’t see any kind of improvement on this,” she said, adding that the medical need in Gaza was acute.
“Even before the aggression, there were severe shortages of drugs – 28 percent of essential goods were at zero stock,” she said. “Now the situation is critical.”
Yet Paul Hirschson, a spokesman for the Israeli Foreign Ministry, said that as the exact terms of the cease-fire agreement had not been made public, much of the expectation had been based upon conjecture.
“I too have heard claims about things Israel and/or others are said to have agreed to. [But] to my knowledge all parties agreed to cease hostilities and through the Egyptians a conversation about the future will take place,” he said. “I suggest we allow the diplomatic conversation to progress.”
At the Egyptian border, too, similar stringent restrictions remain, though hopes were raised for an easing on Aug. 28 when the World Food Program was granted permission to send 18 food trucks through the Rafah crossing.
The deal was the first time since 2007 the organization had used the crossing to deliver aid, which is normally limited to entry through Israel.
Yet WFP officials stressed that the deal was negotiated in recent weeks before the cease-fire. “Our regional bureau has been negotiating with the ministries in Cairo for five weeks for those 18 trucks,” said Sune Kent, WFP Palestine’s head of logistics, emergency preparedness and security.
“Getting goods through Rafah requires continued and very close negotiations with the Egyptian authorities,” she added.
As fears grow that the blockade will not be eased, the people of Gaza could be forgiven for experiencing a sense of déjà vu. In November 2012, following eight days of fighting, an agreement was struck between Hamas and Israel that was supposed to ease the blockade.
Many of the basic tenets of that deal were similar to what was reported of the newly agreed one. Following the agreement, border policies were briefly eased, and Palestinians in Gaza had freer movement both to Egypt and Israel.
Yet while there were initial promising signs, the deal was never fully implemented – partly because the pro- Hamas Muslim Brotherhood-led government in Egypt was overthrown by the country’s military, a move that was supported by mass public demonstrations.
This time, too, the threat of the deal collapsing is real, especially as there appear to be few enforcing mechanisms. Hirschson confirmed that the terms of the agreement included no ways of guaranteeing that either side would fulfill their side of the bargain.
If no policy changes are forthcoming in the coming days, analysts say humanitarian access may ultimately depend on seeking some consensus during the negotiations due to take place in Cairo in the coming weeks.
Finding common ground will be a monumental challenge.
Among the key issues for Hamas are the release of hundreds of prisoners, and the construction of a port and an airport that would allow Palestinians freedom of movement and access to the world without Israeli control.
Nir Bons, a research fellow at the Tel Aviv-based Moshe Dayan Center for Middle East Studies, said that such goals would be unacceptable for Israeli politicians as long as Hamas remained in power.
Referring to the potential ports, he said: “ Israel will not let the Palestinians have them unless there is a very different configuration [of power]. So we are back to square one – Hamas remains in power, determined to continue [its attack until it reaches] Jerusalem. Israel cannot accept this.”
Similarly, Israel’s key demand – the demilitarization of the entire Gaza Strip – is a “nonstarter,” according to Hugh Lovatt, the Israel and Palestine project coordinator at the European Council of Foreign Relations. “It is not realistic in any way,” he said.
Many observers fear, therefore, that if more substantive talks stumble then the crisis will lead to nothing more than a return to the pre-war status quo – with no easing of any of the border controls.
Lovatt said that in such circumstances donors would potentially be hesitant to back relief schemes, particularly if they felt that by failing to tackle the underlying issues another conflict would be likely.
“If you are talking from the point of view as a European taxpayer, your money is going into Gaza to build things and then Israel comes and bombs it. There is an accountability issue,” he said.
WFP’s Kent said food items had been granted access relatively easily by the Israeli authorities throughout the conflict, with an average of one or two days’ wait at the crossings. “It has not been a problem to get in lifesaving humanitarian assistance to Gaza. The Israelis kept the crossing open much more than previous conflicts,” he said.
Yet he pointed out that with much of Gaza’s infrastructure destroyed, food aid was only a short-term fix, and stemming the humanitarian crisis over the longer term required deals on restricted items such as cement and heavy machinery.
“You can’t bring in bottled water for 500,000 people,” he said.
“You need to repair the water facilities. To do that you need technical equipment. That is the most cost-effective way of giving Gazans clean water.”