Mobile  |  About us  |  Photos  |  Videos  |  Subscriptions  |  RSS Feeds  |  Today's Paper  |  Classifieds  |  Contact Us
The Daily Star
THURSDAY, 23 FEB 2012
05:50 AM Beirut time
Weather    
Beirut
12 °C
Blom Index
1,186.9up
A+ A-
     
 
Advanced Search
Politics  
Interview: Refugees will not be citizens of new state
Ambassador Abdullah with Palestine’s symbolic U.N. seat in the foreground. (Photo by Mahmoud Kheir, The Daily Star)
Ambassador Abdullah with Palestine’s symbolic U.N. seat in the foreground. (Photo by Mahmoud Kheir, The Daily Star)

BEIRUT: Palestinian refugees will not become citizens of a new Palestinian state, according to Palestine’s ambassador to Lebanon.

From behind a desk topped by a miniature model of Palestine’s hoped-for blue United Nations chair, Ambassador Abdullah Abdullah spoke to The Daily Star Wednesday about Palestine’s upcoming bid for U.N. statehood.

The ambassador unequivocally says that Palestinian refugees would not become citizens of the sought for U.N.-recognized Palestinian state, an issue that has been much discussed. “They are Palestinians, that’s their identity,” he says. “But … they are not automatically citizens.”

This would not only apply to refugees in countries such as Lebanon, Egypt, Syria and Jordan or the other 132 countries where Abdullah says Palestinians reside. Abdullah said that “even Palestinian refugees who are living in [refugee camps] inside the [Palestinian] state, they are still refugees. They will not be considered citizens.”

Abdullah said that the new Palestinian state would “absolutely not” be issuing Palestinian passports to refugees.

Neither this definitional status nor U.N. statehood, Abdullah says, would affect the eventual return of refugees to Palestine. “How the issue of the right of return will be solved I don’t know, it’s too early [to say], but it is a sacred right that has to be dealt with and solved [with] the acceptance of all.” He says statehood “will never affect the right of return for Palestinian refugees.”

The right of return that Abdullah says is to be negotiated would not only apply to those Palestinians whose origins are within the 1967 borders of the state, he adds. “The state is the 1967 borders, but the refugees are not only from the 1967 borders. The refugees are from all over Palestine. When we have a state accepted as a member of the United Nations, this is not the end of the conflict. This is not a solution to the conflict. This is only a new framework that will change the rules of the game.”

The Palestinian Liberation Organization would remain responsible for refugees, and Abdullah says that UNRWA would continue its work as usual.

U.S. President Barack Obama’s administration recently pledged to veto statehood in the Security Council, which would leave the Palestinians the option of seeking a General Assembly resolution. If this happens, Abdullah says, 129 countries have committed to positive votes.

The United States has of late been taking steps to dissuade the Palestinians from taking their bid to the U.N., sending negotiators to meet with Palestinian officials. The ambassador says these talks have not been fruitful.

“They won’t offer us anything … that saves the peace process,” he says. “They would offer us nothing except to say that they will cut financial aid, and other such threats. Dignity is much more important than a loaf of bread.”

The last minute threats Abdullah refers to include a bill proposed by the chair of the U.S. House Foreign Relations Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, which would cut U.S. funding to any U.N. body that recognizes the Palestinian statehood.

Abdullah says now is the time to seek statehood because the peace process has been stalled for around a year, and rattles off the dates of locations of failed meetings with the Israelis last September.

“These meetings did not bring us one iota closer to achieving the goal the negotiations were resumed to achieve.” He says that there are now new obstacles, including settlement building “with some haste” and Israel’s insistence that the Palestinians recognize Israel as a Jewish state or a national home for the Jewish people.

Abdullah says the Palestinians effectively have no choice but to go to the U.N. With talks at an impasse, he says, “nothing was left for us to protect the international consensus of the two-state solution.”

A U.S. veto in the Security Council, Abdullah says, would only harm the great power. “The United States is propagating that it is the champion of freedom and democracy around the world, and if it denies the Palestinians the right to be free, to be democratic, and to live in dignity, it is not a good sign for the U.S. It leaves a dark stain … It’s not good for America,” he says. “America deserves better.”

He says the U.S. should be mindful of “signals in the region … that are ringing a bell.” He mentions the tension between Turkey and Israel and the recent eruption of protests at the Israeli embassy in Cairo.

“If wrong policies are adopted in the U.S., it will only give a freer hand to extremism. It only empowers negative forces. And this will make it more difficult and complicated for rational forces to prevail.”

Despite clear signs of opposition from the U.S., Abdullah says anything could happen next week, when the U.N.’s General Assembly session opens and the issue of Palestinian statehood will be debated.

“When we go [to the United Nations],” he says, “we [will not] bet on anything.”

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on September 15, 2011, on page 2.
Home Politics
 
 
Advertisement
Comments  
James Hovland September 15, 2011 06:40 AM
The right of return is an individual right that can not be surrendered through negotiations by anyone except those it applies to. This issue should explained thoroughly and never be presented in any other way. Neither the PA, the PLO, nor the state of Palestine can negate any individual's right of return.

Each refugee will need to know where they are from and provide some sort of documentation of that. Those returning to what is now Israel will need to present their case as an individual. For the right of return to be achieved, peace between the people and acceptance of Israeli law is actually required. No refugee hostile toward the Jewish people or rejecting the authority of the state of Israel has a chance at returning. If a case is rejected, the refugee will have the option of appealing that rejection at a later date or settling the claim through other compensation.

There is no precedent for the return of refugees under these circumstances. This is an issue that needs to be reviewed by legal experts, proper procedure determined and both assurances and instructions disseminated to the people.

The most important thing right now is for both the Palestinians and the Israelis to understand that each individual's right of return can not be surrendered by anyone other than that individual.
Jack Kalpakian September 15, 2011 03:12 PM
So we have here a blunt statement of inter-Palestinian discrimination. I think that the US should place a conditionality on recognition -- accept all Palestinians as citizens or the veto will be used. Is the PLO serious about a solution, perhaps it is as serious as its opponents! We have here the proposal for The Provisional Arab Republic of the Cis-Jordan, not Palestine.
Elder September 15, 2011 11:45 PM
Let's get this straight: The Palestinian leadership actively wants to keep hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of Palestinians stateless, without passports or the ability to improve their lot - even the ones who live in Palestine?

And no one sees a problem with this? No one has a problem with this attitude? There is no "Palestinian spring" to topple these so-called "leaders" to whom keeping them miserable is a higher moral duty than to end their suffering?

I find the attitude of Abdullah astonishing. But even more astonishing is that no one else seems to have a problem with it.
L. King September 16, 2011 12:53 AM
In other words, a Palestinian State would not be democratic and free for Palestinian refugees.

Then what good is it? Why should anyone, least of all the US, support another Arab State that refuses to give Palestinians citizenship?
Another Joshua September 16, 2011 02:54 PM
This is the weirdest revelation I have ever read. Please let it it just be another misquote or a mistaken opinion being expressed. No. It cannot be: A Palestinian State that won't recognise its own people,and even those living beyond the post-1949 Green Line?

But hey! This is the Muddle East where all is muddle.
Susanne September 16, 2011 05:32 PM
So the PA has decided that Jews will not be allowed to live in "Palestine", and now it decides that “even Palestinian refugees who are living in [refugee camps] inside the [Palestinian] state, they are still refugees. They will not be considered citizens.”

That would seem to leave--what? A few ibexes and hyraxes?

A clearer statement of contempt for their own people would be hard to imagine, even as a sick parody.
Michael Davison September 17, 2011 10:24 AM
on the basis of this statement alone, the Palestinian Authority should not be recognized as a state. This, along with Mr. Areikat's statement of Jews not being allowed to live in the new state, makes a blatant violation of the UN Charter and declared the intent to create an Apartheid state, also a violation of the UN Charter.
Any country votiung against recognition will be fully justified by these two statements of policy.
Lorna Haisley September 19, 2011 08:58 AM

Michael Davison

Totally agree. I presume this will be brought to the attention of the OIC whom we all know adhere rigidly to the U.N. Charter!

Yet in the one state solution the Arab League put forward they would expect Israel to recognize all these people as Palestinians and give them ROR to Israel. The mind boggles.

Rejane September 19, 2011 11:35 PM
So, the Palestinian first don't want any Jews in their state, now, they don't want any Palestinian refugees...nice...but they keep insisting on having a right of return of Palestinian inside Israel...basically they are acting like all their arab brothers they all love their Palestinian brothers but do not want them in their country (Lebanon for example in which they live as refugees, same in Jordan etc...) basically they agree on one thing they should all be relocated to Israel!!!! interesting!!!!
DAS1951 September 20, 2011 12:38 PM
Mr Hovland's comments are curious, and I am curious on what he bases his assertions.

Hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees from Arab lands have been successfully resettled in Israel (and let's recall that modern Israel is a tiny part of the Palestine that Britain occupied during World War 1) (maybe Israel should demand compensation?) and millions of Europeans have been resettled in new lands (some with redrawn borders) after World War 2, resulting in a long-lasting peace.
DAS1951 September 20, 2011 12:39 PM
Mr Hovland's comments are curious, and I am curious on what he bases his assertions.

Hundreds of thousands of Jewish refugees from Arab lands have been successfully resettled in Israel (and let's recall that modern Israel is a tiny part of the Palestine that Britain occupied during World War 1) (maybe Israel should demand compensation?) and millions of Europeans have been resettled in new lands (some with redrawn borders) after World War 2, resulting in a long-lasting peace.
Oded Israeli September 21, 2011 09:56 PM
So Mahmoud Abbas, the president of the Palestinians Authority, is not going to be citizen of the new Palestinian state? After all, he is a "refugee" - like many other members of the PA...
Anyway, the Palestinians should get that: There is no "right of return" into the Jewish state - and there is not going to be one. Either we're going to have two stats, each for one of the two nations, or we're going to have more war and a new "Nakba". The Jews are not giving up their country and national freedom - and that is that.
Alice September 24, 2011 06:26 AM

The Palestinians always change the game to their advantage yet refuse to compromise. How can people not see this?

Alan Falk September 24, 2011 10:16 AM
great comments, all!
makes me wonder what their definition of "refugee" is...

now, if this alleged State of Palestine were to describe their Constitution, Bill of Rights and basic code of laws FIRST, we might have something to think about.

so far, this looks like more posturing and red herrings designed to do nothing more than impede ANY progress towards peace or peaceful coexistence.

they're not showing any leadership skills at all.
GregoryM September 24, 2011 04:07 PM

This is an astonishing revelation to say the least from a Palestinian official. This is nothing more than a continuation of what has bedeviled the Palestinians since they became stateless, a bunch of corrupt and ineffective leaders. Perhaps a Palestinian spring is needed to change the leadership and its cronies first before asking for a state that would extend citizenship to all Palestinians, including refugees!

Borg September 25, 2011 05:04 AM
I used to be a staunch supporter of a Palestinian state. These comments are a revelation for me, and indicate that the Palestinians are not ready for statehood. We dont need another Somalia
NessieG September 25, 2011 10:34 PM
This is more proof that what the "Palestinian" leadership wants isn't a Palestinian state; their sole aim is to destroy Israel. It is so clear.
speedy September 26, 2011 06:35 PM
It is now abundantly clear even to the most dense supporters of a Palestinian state that there is no end to the conflict. Recognition of a new state merely provides another platform for terror attacks, lawfare and continued dependence on the international community for the support of 4th generation 'refugees'. This is the most cynical abuse of the world's sympathies on record. Why Israel or anyone else would approve of such a deal is a mystery. There must be an end to this situation. Perhaps the elimination of the PLO, the PA and Hamas represents the beginning of an answer. Their sole goal seems to envisage continued disadvantages for stateless Arabs to further their goal of Israel's destruction. Only the cynical dictatorships that dominate the UN could support this idiocy.
Ann B September 27, 2011 02:50 AM
I think it is because the Palestinians don't want to lose the financial support of the United Nations, which would be phased out (one would think) if "Palestine" attained nationhood. In other words, they want to continue to be the world's largest welfare state. Very sad.
Steve September 27, 2011 09:49 AM
There is no Right of Return in international law you dumbo James Hovland. It's time to close that chapter.
Funny September 28, 2011 08:42 AM
So the Palestinians want to create an apartheid state - discriminating against Palestinian refugees! How Brilliant!
Steven Barry October 03, 2011 04:59 AM

Wow.
In 1948 by 'official' counts' some 530,000 Arab residents of what is now Israel left most because they were promised a swift return after Israel was annihilated by the war. A fair number were strongly encouraged to leave after the war. Estimated were some 10% who chose to stay and were not expelled.

When we talk about refugees then, are we referring to the original Arabs who left ? There aren't very many of those as they left in 1948 some 63 years ago. Or are we talking about their descendants too? They now number some 6.5 million by recent estimates ( If we count both those in refugee camps and those who assimilated in other Arab countries)

The current population of Israel is only 7.7 million ( of which 25% are Arabs)

How is it the least bit possible to assimilate that number ? There's minimal land, there's certainly not that many jobs and Israel itself already financially strapped. Most of these folks especially those from the camps are ill equipped for modern life. If only a fraction of the vast wealth accumulated by Arab nations were spent trying to improve the lives of the refugees instead of military supplies. Will they step up after statehood ?

How can the UN expect Israel accept that number of 'returners'? Israel would instantly become an Arab dominated state ? Why would they ever agree to that?

We've got to be realistic. The clock can't be turned back to some convenient date. Can you imagine the US even considering returning the lands they obtained from Native Americans ?

The only solution I can think of is to get all the Nations of the area to agree to absorb some per cent of the folks in camps. The 'two state solution' isn't a solution that's gonna work at this time. Perhaps in the future the area will become a Middle east bloc recognizing and respecting one another's right to exist. Open the area to trade and common goals.

Building walls, creating an apartheid state and screwing the Arab refugees yet again isn't going to solve much IMO

Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site. All fields are mandatory.

Name *
Email *
Country *
City *
Comment *
Word Count: Left:
Toolbox
print
email
e-paper
e-paper
More from
Annie Slemrod
Abbas, Meshaal to meet Thursday to discuss deal: Zaki
The last of Lebanon’s Arab weavers struggle to make a decent living
No accountability for deadly Burj al-Barajneh electrocutions
Palestinian property ownership law ‘unjust,’ says LPDC head
All you wanted to know about whiskey, but were shy to ask
Migrant domestic workers develop survival techniques amid harsh conditions
Politicians, inmates slam state of Roumieh
Faulty implants don’t require removal: top Lebanese surgeon
Unsafe Moseitebeh building evacuated
2 Sudanese collapse survivors taken into custody
View allview all
Advertisement
Most Popular
Viewed Searched e-mailed
1. Russia says U.S. might use Kyrgyz airbase in Iran strike
 
2. Israel says Hezbollah using West Africa as powerbase
 
3. Saudi Arabia says no use in dialogue in Syria
 
4. Priest dies in hit-and-run in Beirut suburb
 
5. 2 Western journalists killed as Syria shells Homs
 
6. Assad seeks to bomb Homs into submission, alarms world
Advertisement
 
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Linked In Follow us on Google+ Subscribe to our Live Feed
 
Multimedia
Images Video  
Rio Carnival 2012 in pictures
The Carnival is the grandest holiday in Brazil, annually drawing millions to Rio de Janeiro and other cities for four days of celebrations that culminate on 'Fat Tuesday' before the start of the Catholic season of Lent.
View all view all
Rami G. Khouri
Rami G. Khouri
When dignity drives a Doha airport bus
Michael Young
Michael Young
Washington’s Syria policy is imaginary
David Ignatius
David Ignatius
Iran will bend when facing an unwinnable conflict
View all view all
 
cartoon
 
Click to View Articles
Advertisement
 
 
News
Business
Opinion
Sports
Culture
Technology
Entertainment
Privacy Policy | Anti-Spamming Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice
© 2011 The Daily Star - All Rights Reserved - Designed and Developed By IDS