Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The latest dispute to blow up around the International Agency for Research on Cancer concerns glyphosate, an ingredient in one of the world's most widely used weed killers, Roundup, made by Monsanto.An EFSA spokesman said its assessment considered hundreds of scientific studies, both independent and industry-sponsored."The status of a study – e.g. independent or industry-sponsored – is irrelevant to the assessment if the study is designed, carried out and reported well," he said in an emailed response. He said EFSA had published detailed information about every study used in its glyphosate assessment, including regulatory studies submitted by companies.A public war of words between EFSA and IARC has ensued.EFSA defended its finding on glyphosate and hit back.Url also published an 18-page response to the letter from the 96 scientists, explaining how EFSA took a different approach to IARC.
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE