Mobile  |  About us  |  Photos  |  Videos  |  Subscriptions  |  RSS Feeds  |  Today's Paper  |  Classifieds  |  Contact Us
The Daily Star
SATURDAY, 26 MAY 2012
06:03 PM Beirut time
Weather    
Beirut
23 °C
Blom Index
1,164.1up
A+ A-
     
 
Advanced Search
Columnist  
U.S. democracy is no model for Arabs

I had a particularly enlightening and depressing day last week as a student of American democracy and Arab-Israeli diplomacy. I know better now why most Arabs have totally given up on expecting anything positive or fair to emerge from the United States when it comes to the Middle East. Democracy is a great and noble venture and a most utilitarian governance system; but it also has a dark and ugly side that is very visible in the U.S. these days.

My day started out while I was reading The New York Times on the flight from Boston to Philadelphia, including a front page article that noted, “The growing influence of Islamists in Libya raises hard questions about the ultimate character of the government and society that will rise in the place of Col. Muammar Gaddafi’s autocracy.”

In what has become nearly the norm in American journalism and that of some other Western societies, even among quality media, wildly vague, unattributed and mostly unsubstantiated assertions are made about Arab or Islamic societies that include pessimistic expectations about what might result from the current revolts. Will Islamists take over? Will we have another Iran? Will democratic Arabs threaten Israel and badmouth the U.S.? Will the democratic moment wither away to be replaced by the authoritarianism that Arabs seem to know best?

Such attitudes reflect prevailing concerns, biases, fears, assumptions and preconceptions among some quarters across the U.S., without really subjecting the issues to any sort of rigorous intellectual or even professional journalistic scrutiny. This trend has been with us since the Arab Awakening started last December, and reflects not only Western fears and prejudices, but also some lingering Orientalism and a bit of racism here and there.

My second lesson in the vagaries in democracy – at least as practiced in the United States – occurred later that same day when I attended a city council meeting in Philadelphia. I went to hear the discussion about a resolution – which passed, as expected – strongly supporting U.S. Senate Resolution 185 that denounces the Palestinian request for United Nations recognition of statehood, threatens the Palestinians with American financial aid cutoffs, attacks Hamas in every possible manner, and generally repeats a litany of pro-Israel, anti-Palestinian positions that come right out of the Israeli lobby handbook of distortions, exaggerations and general hysteria.

There was good news and bad news here, though, because the frenzied rush by the Philadelphia city council to suddenly take a very one-sided position on a foreign policy issue that is beyond the mandate of the council was somewhat offset by several other factors. The fact that this issue was discussed in public was a sign that times are changing to some extent, because this pro-Israel position would normally pass without any discussion. The council’s public comments period saw half a dozen pro-Israel speakers, including the local Israeli consul-general, recite the usual arguments that held up very badly when assessed against the facts of the situation, but went over very well in the American political system in which Israeli views hold sway over any other argument – including the arguments in favor of the American national interest, it seems. But a handful of Americans (church officials, an Arab-American activist, a Jewish-American activist) also spoke up against the resolution, explaining why it was factually wrong, politically imbalanced, and diplomatically tendentious.

Lobbying by these and other people forced the council to vote on the resolution (instead of unanimously approving it, as was the case with other less contentious issues that day); and in the end two city council members voted against it, one abstained, and the others approved.

I left the chamber realizing that little has changed or will change in the U.S. vis-à-vis the severe pro-Israel bias on Arab-Israeli issues, partly because pro-Israel lobbies operate very effectively at local levels across the country, as well as through Washington-based institutions like registered lobbyists and think tanks. Yet forcing a vote, airing opposing views, and having three council members not vote for the resolution were small but meaningful signs of how serious activism and moral courage to speak out can have some impact in the U.S., however limited.

My conclusion at the end of the day was that the struggle for justice, fairness and equal rights in Israel and Palestine will not be won or even seriously nudged forward in the United States, where the structural biases for Zionist zealotry are too deeply entrenched.

This has also been a useful refresher course for me – 40 years after living and attending university in the United States – on why American democracy is not a useful model for the Arab world. I understand better now why Palestinians are taking their battle for statehood to the U.N. and defying the U.S. and its threats and blackmail; and why so many newly democratizing Arab societies are asking Americans offering money, advice and assistance on democratic state-building to stay home for now.

It’s amazing how much you can learn in America about democracy’s strengths and weaknesses in a day, traveling between the wellsprings of America’s imperfect democracy in Boston and Philadelphia.

Rami G. Khouri is published twice weekly by THE DAILY STAR.

A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on September 17, 2011, on page 7.
Home Columnist
 
 
Advertisement
Comments  
George September 17, 2011 08:17 AM
The democracy in the US may indeed be a bad model for the Arab world when one thinks about the Mosques, synagogues, and churches that co-exist in most american cities. This is not the type of democracy one will find in the Arab and indeed Muslim world where demonization of Jews and "Crusaders" is unfortunately the norm. Other than a few moderate countries, blind support for the Hamas and Hezbollah movements continues despite their attacks on civilians now and in the past. The sooner the US removes its troops from Muslim lands and allows the Arabs to deal with their own problems the better. US support for Israel will remain strong but our hopes for a democratic and peaceful non terrorist Palestinian state also remains unwavering. Rejection of terrorism of Hamas and Hezbollah will be a blessing for all peace loving peoples of the region. Though many of the West Bank settlements will be disbanded as part of a negotiated treaty just as they were with Eqypt in the past, Mr Khouri and others will continue to use them as an excuse to support Islamist terror.
Nkoula Nkoula September 17, 2011 05:03 PM

Dear Mr. Khoury,
I sympathize with what you wrote but also disagree. The US democracy is a great model for certain Arab countries where religious groups coexist. The US constitution protects religious and other minorities. The US is a government of laws and not of men (rule of law). 'Minorities' in the Arab world are protected by 'the fear factor'.
I have also attended few city councils in NY state where local and political questions were debated in a very civilized way. Sometimes the debate was heated especially when the war in Iraq was discussed. Instead, of bashing it, we in the Arab world have a lot to learn form the American experience.
As for the Palestinian question and the 'Zionist lobby', maybe it is time for us to act and to lobby the rest of the world instead of just lamenting and waiting for others to do what we are supposed to do. Why would the US and other powers help the Arabs if their regimes are corrupt and antidemocratic? Many Americans sympathize with the Palestinians but also disagree with their doings. The Arab spring we are experiencing is a first step in this long 'to do' list towards democratization. Taking the battle to the UN is next. So is modernization and rejection of terrorism.
I am just afraid your article had a touch of lamenting.

Mladen Matosevic September 18, 2011 01:09 AM

Of course, you should look more to Europe because the Arab situation is closer to the European; there are also tribes living for a millennium on one plot of land, ethnic and religious divisions. Bloody wars were fought in Europe for land and loot under the mask of religions or ideology. It is difficult to explain all of this to someone raised in the American melting pot, but people of the Old World understand it intuitively.

As for democracy, it is only a way to replace government once it runs out of fresh ideas (which is after 5-10 years).

Maeghan Mikorski September 18, 2011 08:52 AM

Mr. Khouri,

First I would like to thank you for your presentation at Villanova this past week, which was both insightful and entertaining.

Unfortunately, you are dead on about the pro-Israel bias that is firmly cemented in our politics. Any criticism of Israeli policy, no matter how valid, is met with accusations of Anti-Semitism and sympathy for terrorists (a trend that has been demonstrated in the comments section of this very article). One need look no further than the protesters who called President Obama a "Jew-Hater," simply because he suggested the Israelis should follow international law they themselves have already agreed to.

The fact that most Palestinians are neither terrorists nor Islamic extremists seems to be left out of the debate entirely. Most Americans are unaware that 11,000 Palestinians (some of them children) are currently in Israeli prisons, most of whom without trial.

When Americans realize that Palestinians are human beings who have just as much right to live in peace and dignity as their Israeli neighbors, perhaps then the U.S. could contribute in some meaningful way toward the peace process. Until then, Americans and Israelis will unite to ensure that the Palestinians will never be granted an equal seat at the bargaining table.

abdussalam September 18, 2011 01:25 PM

Democracy always ceases to exist when it comes to the Arab world all because of the Zionist lobby in America twisting facts. They are responsible for all the hate between the Arabs and the Americans: they are always the ones who pollute the atmosphere between Arabs an Americans.

Ed Jazairi September 19, 2011 06:59 AM
Mr. Khoury, please slow down!? Some aspects of the structure of the US democracy make sense especially in a country like Syria. For example the establishment of a US senate to represent states rather than voting districts is a case in point. The creation of the US senate as you may know had balanced large states interests with large populations with regards to smaller states interests with smaller popualtions. This equal say by smaller states had a beneficial effect in stopping legislations that are harmful to these small states with smaller populations. As applied to syria, let me give you an example! If a similar kind of legislative body is created in Syria. Let me call it majlis al-shoyoukh. Then larger provinces such as Damascus , Aleppo and Homs and their large populations for example will not dominate smaller provinces such as Al-Hasaka, Latakia and Souieda in all aspects of political life be it legislatively, culturally and politically. Meaning, Damascus Aleppo and homs will not be able to dictate the the agenda of these big cities to their smaller counterparts. If there is to be a new Syria with full political participations for all in a democratic system!? Then an establishment of a Syrian Senate very similar to the US Senate is a must. A passionate or manupilative legislations that benefit only big cities and big provinces at the expense of smaller provinces with small populations in only one elected chamber let us say majlis al-nowab must be slowed down to a halt by a newly founded majlis al-shoyoukh. Let me be more blunt!? A Sunni Arab majority in Damascus, Aleppo or Homs will not be able to dictate laws on Kurds, Assyrians in Al-Hasaka or the Alawites in Latakia or the Druze of Souieda. Basically, there will be no laws added to the books of a new Syria unless the absolute majority of Syrians of all stripes have had the chance to approve it. In short this is one of the wonders of the US system of democracy that can be adopted by some states in the Middle East.
Thanks
ahmad karrqm September 19, 2011 09:27 AM

Mr Kouri, you lived in the U.S. for 40 years and you still don't know that American democracy is failing in every test. Palestine and Israel, Wall Street vs. the American people, the military industrial complex vs. the people, oil companies vs. the people and you could go on and on. People keep on voting and falling behind democracy which is supposed to make its people’s lives better and not leave 40 to 50 million of its people with no health insurance while it is spending billions chasing the Taliban in the mountains of Afghanistan; in a country where its supreme court rules that a corporation is a person: that means democracy is for corporations and special interest groups and the rich but not for the people. So wake up everyone; smell the roses. And I leave you with a final thought: would any democracy allow for 10 percent of its people to own 78 percent of its wealth? Food for thought. Do the Arab people need advice from this kind of democracy?

Fawaz H. ALFAWAZ September 19, 2011 01:04 PM
It is amazing to me how we the Arabs translate moral decay into a quest for superficial domcracy.The yearning for good governence is starkly different from the trapping of US STYLE DEMOCARCY , not only in form but but in substance .
The creeping age of economics will not allow the Arab countries/societies to evelove similarly if the march of time is the only impediment , but alsa things are more complex anyhow.
The vale build up and the linkages in societies can be build only through proper economic conduct which missing , it is equally true that it is a political act to kick the process , and that is where good governence comes ,if you leave it to desperate people to sell themselves to opportunistic new political class it is bound to be short term actions and weak bet on long term plans.

Riyadh based colomnist
rye September 19, 2011 06:24 PM

Dear Mr. Khoury,

As a resident of Philadelphia, I am neither a Zionist zealot nor a deep supporter of Israel, but it is naive to believe Israel and the United States are completely at fault.

I applaud the Palestinians for taking their struggle to the U.N. I truly believe that Palestinians have every right to their own nation and own national identity. I only have one question: If the resolution were to pass, and the United States did not veto, then who is going to enforce the resolution?

While it is a noble action and will result in redirecting international focus to the Palestinian issue, I fear for the lives of both Palestinians and Israelis if the resolution were to pass because it would most likely spark an international crisis, a lose-lose for both Palestinians and Israelis. But it won’t because the Obama administration has clearly stated it will veto. What happens then? The world continues to hate the United States (which it already does vehemently), and the quest for direct talks seems even more unobtainable.

I don’t see any issues being resolved with a U.N. recognition of Palestine, only more lives lost on both sides. There are issues within the parties on both sides of the table, and until these are resolved, there will be no peaceful implementation of a Palestinian state, but then again, maybe a peaceful solution isn’t possible? We may find out in the next few weeks.

Jo September 19, 2011 07:12 PM

U.S. "democracy" is no model for the U.S. either. Particularly, because this ain't no democracy but full-blown imperialism. Great for the imperialists but not so much for those under its jackboot.

jane September 19, 2011 11:35 PM
Mr Khoury
Please feel free to leave the US,if you feel disadvantaged. Nobody urged you to stay and criticize the greatest democracy. I am sure in Lebanon as well as in other arab country, you will be able to speak your mind just as freely as you would here in the US
Bill September 20, 2011 03:20 AM
Thanks for your editorial Mr. Khouri. I always appreciate reading your trenchantly stated views. Too often we Americans react negatively when we hear or read viewpoints different than majority opinion dictated from on high. I saw some comments that rather than address the issues you raised, critisized political systems in Arab countries, which is not what you were writing about. Anything to distract attention from the unpleasant truth. Keep up your keen observations...they do get noticed.
john Q September 21, 2011 04:00 PM
I was struck by the irony that the one-sidedness you decry in American support for Israel was reflected in the one-sidedness of your article. What about the virulent anti-Israel, even anti-Jewish nature of the Arab press? Where in the Arab press does Israel get any kind of fair representation?

Instead of providing a well-balanced description of the situation, you play the game of blaming Israel for everything and even evoke the mythical power of the Jewish conspiracy in the form of the Israel Lobby.

And you complain about biases and misconceptions?
imad September 22, 2011 08:08 PM
US democray stops at its borders, if that. While the US brags about being the world guardian of human rights and democratic ideals on one hand, it supports, funds, and arms dictatorships around the world, and actualy sabotaging popular movements and leaders that do not agree with it. So America has never been a model of democracy, it was and still is a model of hypocrisy. It is not enough to have free speech rights and a free market,to be called a democratic nation, more is needed from the US because where much is given, much is needed. The US is in a position of great responsibility, and It must act accordingly and must stop its empire aspiration, otherwise it will face a Roman destiny very soon...
Andrew September 24, 2011 09:40 PM

Mr. Khouri, you may have heard the quote, "A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." There is some dispute about who originally said this, but nonetheless this is how America's founders generally regarded "democracy." This is why the USA was meant to be a representative republic, not a democracy. I agree, the city council debacle you witnessed is in fact what's wrong with American democracy. But this is not specific to America, it's the problem with democracy anywhere. The root problem in America goes back to the Civil War or War Between the States. This was the beginning of the end of our Republic.

Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site. All fields are mandatory.

Name *
Email *
Country *
City *
Comment
*
Word Count: Left:
Toolbox
print
email
e-paper
e-paper
More from
Rami G. Khouri
Egyptians as they really are, for once
Why are Arabs in a state of revolt?
The Palestinian struggle persists
Urban warfare, the modern Arab scourge
The electoral bandwagon reaches Algeria
The implications of the Bahrain crisis
Let’s deal with the essential in Osama bin Laden’s life
No to double standards on global thugs
Arab youths have just started to act
Arab disorder is a sign of vitality
View allview all
Advertisement
Most Popular
Viewed Searched e-mailed
1. Lebanese abducted in Syria free in Turkey, waiting to come home
 
2. Hezbollah says for unconditional dialogue, thanks Hariri for hostage release efforts
 
3. Syria grain trade signals alarm for Assad
 
4. In a first, U.S. declares 5 million Palestinians to be refugees: report
 
5. Over 90 killed in Syria massacre: activists
 
6. Nasrallah thanks Hariri on efforts to free abducted Lebanese
Advertisement
 
Follow us on Facebook Follow us on Twitter Follow us on Linked In Follow us on Google+ Subscribe to our Live Feed
 
Multimedia
Images Video  
Pictures of the Day
A selection of images from around the world- Thursday May 24, 2012
View all view all
Rami G. Khouri
Rami G. Khouri
Egyptians as they really are, for once
Michael Young
Michael Young
Will Tripoli make Samir Geagea pay?
David Ignatius
David Ignatius
A string of detonators cuts through the Middle East
View all view all
 
cartoon
 
Click to View Articles
Advertisement
 
 
News
Business
Opinion
Sports
Culture
Technology
Entertainment
Privacy Policy | Anti-Spamming Policy | Disclaimer | Copyright Notice
© 2011 The Daily Star - All Rights Reserved - Designed and Developed By IDS