Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Sometimes U.S. global strategy can be as haphazard as that. But something close to a coherent, consensus policy toward Russia emerged over four days of debate by the Aspen Strategy Group, a gathering of senior current and former officials, plus some think tank leaders and journalists. The discussions converged on an approach that resists President Vladimir Putin's push in Ukraine, while continuing to engage Russia economically and politically. The plan to send humanitarian aid, administered by the International Committee of the Red Cross, in Russian convoys across the border into eastern Ukraine was just taking shape as we met, with some arguing that this was a face-saving exit for Putin and others countering that it was a cover for Russian invasion.Putin had made three big mistakes in Ukraine, noted one commentator.As the Aspen discussions progressed, participants focused increasingly on positive steps the U.S. could take to complement the negative pressure of sanctions. Several also noted that the U.S. should quietly advise Ukraine on ways to make an invasion costly for Russia.
U.S. president fomenting
damaging trans-Atlantic rift
Does the pathway to containing Iran pass through Moscow?
Sane Iran policy bets on the people, not the regime
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE