Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The militant wave rolling back toward Europe is dizzying: U.S. intelligence agencies estimate that more than 38,000 foreign fighters have traveled to Iraq and Syria since 2012 .Belgium's failure was cooked into the system: The militants move stealthily, and the Belgians didn't collect or share enough of the intelligence that was there.How could the U.S. and Europe develop a more effective strategy to combat Daesh? It would begin with truly shared intelligence and military command. Experts say that the United Kingdom and France have strong spy agencies; Germany's is competent but afraid to level with its public; the rest are relatively weak, and there is no Europe-wide spy agency.Intelligence strategies that worked against Al-Qaeda may not succeed with this adversary.More "human intelligence" – real spies daring to penetrate the enemy camp – is essential, however risky.European intelligence services must combine forces with the U.S. and with each other.
The world is adapting to the reality of Trump as president
American leaders could learn from 1918
U.S. needs leader to capture high ground of technology
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE