Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The Democratic Party has reacted to its series of recent election losses by once again concluding that it needs a better economic message.The only disagreement within the party is about how sharp-edged and left-wing that message should be.After that, the two best predictors were "fears of cultural displacement" and support for deporting undocumented immigrants.Bill Clinton's party was careful to come across as moderate on many social issues. It had a middle-of-the-road position on immigration, and it was cautiously progressive on subjects like gay rights. The Democrats eventually moved boldly leftward in some of these areas, like gay rights, out of an admirable sense of principle. In a broader, cultural sense, the Democratic Party moved left because it became a party dominated by urban, college-educated professionals, and its social and cultural views naturally mirrored this reality.The party should take a position on immigration that is less absolutist and recognizes both the cultural and economic costs of large-scale immigration.
It’s time for Congress to curb the powers of the president
Everywhere, there is growing backlash to populism
Urban-rural chasm defines new Western political divide
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE