BEIRUT

Commentary

Vladimir Putin takes Russia into a new culture war

August is often an unlucky month in Russia, particularly President Vladimir Putin’s Russia. Submarines have sunk, neighbors have been invaded, and forests have burned out of control. But, this August, the crisis was purely man-made – indeed, made by one man. The conviction some weeks ago of three members of the agitprop punk-rock group Pussy Riot for “hooliganism motivated by religious hatred” turned the three young women into an international cause celebre. Last week a Russian court was to begin hearing an appeal by the women, but the session was adjourned until Oct. 10.

On Feb. 21, 2012 five members of the group tried to stage a performance, later described as a “punk prayer” in Moscow’s Cathedral of Christ the Savior. The “prayer” lasted only 40 seconds, at which point security personnel expelled the performers. But their visit to Russia’s largest church was not in vain – footage of five women, dressed in glowing dresses and balaclavas while jumping in front of the altar, circulated widely on the Internet.

Their song accused Kirill, patriarch of the Russian Orthodox Church, of kowtowing to the government and advised him to believe in God, not Putin. The song’s refrain – “Mother of God, drive Putin away!” – incited the wrath of both church and state. So retribution was certain. The word “blasphemy” was used more frequently. On March 3, the day before the presidential election, two members of the group, Nadezhda Tolokonnikova and Maria Alekhina, were arrested. A third, Yekaterina Samutsevich, followed them to jail 12 days later.

Initially, Pussy Riot’s troubles attracted little attention, but the hate campaign orchestrated by Orthodox activists and the threat of a seven-year prison sentence for the women turned the tide. Moscow liberals, initially treating the performance as silly, saw the threat of prison as inappropriate and the proceedings of the court as demented. The case also attracted attention in the West. Dozens of pop stars rallied in support of the women.

Of course, Pussy Riot could hardly be classified as musicians. They were more interested in creating visual images. Both the feminist chants and the primitive chords were secondary to the spectacle. In a sense, Pussy Riot created a simulacrum of a punk-rock group, a piece of performance art about anonymous protest musicians being mistaken for real musicians by real musicians.

Some of the punk-feminists’ militant accusers saw in their choice of Christ the Savior a diabolical plot against not only Orthodoxy, but also Russia itself. They repeated ad nauseam that the cathedral was constructed as a monument to the victory over Napoleon Bonaparte, the 200th anniversary of which is being commemorated this year. But they neglected to mention that it was destroyed, on Joseph Stalin’s order, in 1931 to make way for a Palace of Soviets, which was never constructed. In 1960, the long-neglected pit for the palace’s foundation was transformed into a swimming pool.

In 1994, reconstruction of the cathedral began. President Boris Yeltsin’s main ideological project, completed in 2000, aimed to undo symbolically the years of communist rule and return Russia to its past. But the new-old church could not turn back time. If it became a symbol, it was of Putin’s new Russia, with its mix of jingoistic nationalism and state religion; so any attack on a monument embodying the unity of church and state under Putin could not go unpunished.

The Pussy Riot trial was, of course, a travesty of justice, with the prosecution quoting the canons of the Quinisext Council, which took place in Constantinople in 692, under Byzantine Emperor Justinian II. The supposed victims of the Pussy Riot “prayer” – mainly the security guards – testified that they could not sleep after witnessing the performance. Larisa Pavlova, the supposed victims’ lawyer, averred that, “Feminism is a deadly sin.”

The political character of the performance was studiously ignored, and the verdict of the judge, who sentenced the trio to two years in prison, proved to be the show trial’s scandalous denouement. According to Russia’s Presidential Council of Human Rights, Tolokonnikova, Alekhina and Samutsevich were punished for a crime that does not exist – and therefore is not punishable – under Russian legislation. The Council quoted St. Paul: “I had not known sin, but by the law: for I had not known lust, except the law had said.”

What we have witnessed since August is the latest battle in a Kulturkampf between Russia’s liberal intelligentsia and conservative, often fundamentalist, believers in the unity of the Orthodox Church and the Kremlin. By punishing Pussy Riot, Putin has staked his presidency on an eventual conservative victory. Which side the Holy Virgin takes remains to be seen.

Konstantin Akinsha is an art historian and contributing editor to ARTnews magazine. THE DAILY STAR publishes this commentary in collaboration with Project Syndicate © (www.project-syndicate.org).

 
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on October 09, 2012, on page 7.
Advertisement

Comments

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

comments powered by Disqus

Advertisement

FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE

Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here