BEIRUT

Commentary

Lebanon’s civil marriage debate highlights sectarian rule

Kholoud Succariyeh, a Sunni Lebanese woman, and Nidal Darwish, a Shiite Lebanese man, recently decided to get a civil marriage in Lebanon. As this institution doesn’t exist in the country, unsurprisingly the Lebanese government did not recognize the civil union. But the couple succeeded in getting the attention of the country’s politicians and religious leaders. With parliamentary elections around the corner, the attention given to Succariyeh and Darwish’s failed civil marriage attempt, might provide an opportunity to revisit Lebanon’s civil status law. The issue is not new in Lebanon, where 18 religious sects have jurisdiction over marriage and divorce, inheritance, child custody and other aspects of a person’s life. Attempts to introduce secular marriages into the legal system date back to the 1950s, but Succariyeh and Darwish argue that the law already makes provision for civil marriage. With the help of legal activists, they base their claim on an interpretation of decree No. 60 of a 1936 law, which recognizes and grants civil rights to people with no religious affiliation.

The bride and groom first went through an administrative procedure to strike their religion off their official records. After that and almost a year’s worth of paperwork, a notary married the couple and they submitted their marriage contract to the Interior Ministry to obtain a marriage license. While it was rejected by the Justice Ministry, the initiative’s strong media impact is a victory in itself.

There are prominent voices in Lebanon that strongly condemning civil marriage. Lebanon’s Grand Mufti Sheikh Mohammad Rashid Qabbani issued a fatwa to punish those who might approved of it. Christian leaders refrained from major declarations, but the Higher Shiite Council spoke out against legalizing civil marriage and called for an interfaith dialogue over the issue among various sects.

This call for an interfaith dialogue of religious leaders to weigh in on a civil status matter highlights the extent to which Lebanon’s confessional system still prevails: 18 sects living and working alongside each other, with religious authorities implementing their respective laws in each community.

However, those in favor of civil marriage are also speaking out. And in an election year, this debate will have particular importance. In reaction to the mufti’s declarations, activists redoubled their efforts in favor of civil marriage, banking on the buzz created by the couple.

On the political side, Prime Minister Najib Mikati dismissed debates over civil marriage, saying it was “useless.” However, President Michel Sleiman and former Prime Minister Saad Hariri have both spoken out in favor of civil marriage, a significant achievement for an issue that is not often addressed on the agenda of political leaders.

Since 2009, the Lebanese have had the option of removing their religious identity from their civil records. But so far the administrative procedure is only symbolic. It is still impossible for a citizen to exist outside the authority of a sectarian framework.

This is a major obstacle to what has been Lebanon’s biggest challenge since the country’s beginnings: nurturing a sense of national identity that would prevail over sectarian divisions, and in turn, building a real and valid social contract between the individual and the state.

As for the religious debate, imposing a religious law over all citizens, believers or not, arguably demeans the spiritual value of a religious marriage. The ceremony should be only for those who have chosen the institution out of their own free will. Otherwise, what is the meaning of faith?

It is worth noting that Succariyeh and Darwish also married in a religious ceremony, but they did not register their religious marriage with the authorities. Though they are religious themselves, they insist on the need for a civil status law and will fight for it.

Marriage is only the tip of the iceberg in a complex and extensive sectarian system. Legalizing civil marriage on Lebanese soil could be an important milestone in strengthening a Lebanese identity, helping to overcome Lebanon’s permanent fragility.

Nada Akl is a freelance journalist in Beirut. THE DAILY STAR publishes this commentary in collaboration with the Common Ground News Service (www.commongroundnews.org).

 
A version of this article appeared in the print edition of The Daily Star on February 12, 2013, on page 7.

Recommended

Advertisement

Comments

Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)

comments powered by Disqus

Advertisement

FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE

Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here