Compared to Syria, Egypt, Yemen and Libya, Tunisia’s democratic transition, while still nascent, has been marked by herculean political calm. These days in Tunisia, government headlines change by the second. It’s a full-time job to stay on top of the news as coalitions dissolve, new ones are formed, and old alliances are renewed. In such a dynamic atmosphere, it is difficult to identify common interests as a basis for national dialogue, however, regardless of political proclivity or economic echelon, Tunisians can unite over a shared desire for better security and increased employment.
Last Oct. 23, with remarkable composure, Tunisians voted in a coalition government, known as the troika, lead by Ennahda’s Hamadi Jebali as prime minister, Ettakatol’s Mustapha Ben Jaafer as president of the National Constituent Assembly, and Congress for the Republic’s Moncef Marzouki as president.
While there was public criticism by opposition parties and supporters of the new government’s ascension to power, many Tunisians were ready to give the democratic process that had brought these parties to power a chance.
However, on Feb. 6, 2013, the political balance was shaken again when Chokri Belaid, a prominent lawyer, leading member of one of Tunisia’s leftist parties, the Front Populaire, and ardent critic of governing party Ennahda, was killed in front of his home in Tunis. Tens of thousands of Tunisians gathered, for the most-part peacefully, during Belaid’s funeral in Tunis, while protests over poor economic and security conditions continued across the country – most notably in Gafsa, Sfax and Sidi Bouzid, where the revolution began in 2010. It is still not known who was responsible for Belaid’s murder.
After admitting failure to form a nonpartisan government of technocrats and mediate the political deadlock of his country, Jebali resigned. The former interior minister and Ennahda member Ali Larayedh, appointed in his wake, told the Tunisian public, “We are going to enter the phase of forming a new government that will be for all Tunisian men and women, taking into account the fact that men and women have equal rights and responsibilities.”
For many, “equal rights and responsibilities for all” is contingent upon a feeling of national security. As Tunisians ease into a post-Ben Ali era, the state-sponsored sense of security has long disappeared. Last week, the Tunisian National Guard seized AK-47s, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, munitions and explosives in the town of Mnihla on the outskirts of Tunis. And this is not the first arms depot to be found.
Despite differences in opinions among Tunisians over whether the state should be formally influenced by the Muslim-faith of the majority, or whether there should be a separation of religion and state, there has never been a culture of arms in Tunisia. With arms appearing among the public, a majority of Tunisians, regardless of political affiliation, are troubled by this new trend.
In addition, 92 percent of Tunisians said that improved economic conditions were the top priority, in a poll conducted by Pew Global Attitudes Project last July. And 78 percent said they were dissatisfied with the direction of their country. Since July, the situation has not improved and neither has the opinion of its citizens.
Tunisia’s tenuous sense of security is destroying the national economy. Standard & Poor’s downgraded Tunisia’s credit rating to BB-, citing political instability as the root cause of the downgrade. With tourism and foreign investment down and an inflation rate at 10 percent, hopes of the once vibrant economy’s recovery seem dismal.
Among Tunisians, it is clear that the causes of unemployment are due not only to a lack of initiative on the part of the unemployed, but also to the lack of effort put forth by the government to fix the problem. Additionally, there remains a lack of employers, a problem that will only be solved with an improvement in the political and economic situation of the country that will require the involvement of all Tunisians, regardless of political affiliation.
While many Tunisians are calling for a national dialogue to resolve the current impasse – few are clear on what exactly this means. Dialogue itself cannot be an end to the conflict and tensions, but instead the means by which to solve problems. And that requires shared interests – in this case a desire for economic and physical security – that will bring all parties, and indirectly their supporters, to the table.
Lamia Hatira is a consultant specializing in research, baseline assessments, and feasibility studies in Africa. Nura Suleiman is the MEPI alumni coordinator at the American Institute for Maghreb Studies in Tunis. THE DAILY STAR publishes this commentary in collaboration with the Common Ground News Service (www.commongroundnews.org).