Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The international coalition against ISIS has yielded contentious results. While ISIS control over large swaths of territory in both Syria and Iraq may have sparked international outrage, the conflicting agendas of countries in the region with regard to Syria and Iraq have greatly complicated the anti-ISIS campaign. Three years into the Syrian war, which has resulted in the death of over 200,000 people, chemical weapon strikes and the indiscriminate use of "barrel bombings," an international coalition was put in place only when an ISIS surge from Syria led to the takeover of Mosul and pushed too close to Iraq's Kurdish areas. Illustrating this is Turkey's murky relationship with ISIS.The war against ISIS has been used as justification for the current American policy toward Syria.A convenient enemy in ISIS has justified a failed Western policy toward Syria, in what may be the most brutal conflict this decade.Shiite militant groups, whether Lebanese, Syrian or Iraqi, are being positioned as tools to defeat ISIS.
Lebanon’s inevitable free fall
Challenges, grievances giving Daesh the chance to thrive in Iraq, Syria
Russia’s disinformation changed how we see Syria
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE