Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Anyone who doubts that the wars in Iraq and Syria are closely connected need look no further than the role of Al-Qaeda's Islamic State in Iraq and Greater Syria, whose fighters have been pouring over the Syrian border into Iraq's Anbar Province.As much as Iraq's Sunnis fear for their future, the Shiite majority, now overseeing the untested proposition of a Shiite-led Arab state, also have reasons to be fearful.The Sunni community, now buffeted by Al-Qaeda on one side and the Shiite state on the other, has never had much interest in helping Maliki stabilize Iraq's new political order.It is not at all clear that Iraq's Sunnis are ready to accept any Shiite leadership.Iraqiyya's Shiite leader never once campaigned in southern Iraq, where most Shiites live.Iraq's Shiites are Iraqis and Arabs first, and Shiite second.Given the strength and territorial concentration of Iraq's Shiite, Sunni and Kurdish communities, any successful Iraqi government must find ways to rule the country through inter-communal consensus. The Saudis do not appear to want to mediate between Shiites and Sunnis, or even between rival Sunnis.
Giving democracy a stained finger
Trump’s missing North Korea strategy
An agenda for U.S.-Iran negotiations
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE