Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Those praising Lee Kuan Yew ignored the benefits of democracyFew politicians have garnered as many effusive public tributes after their death as Lee Kuan Yew, Singapore's founder and long-serving former prime minister. Like many authoritarian leaders (Benito Mussolini, for one), Lee was once a socialist.There is something extraordinary about the adulation of Lee.Lee never claimed that liberal democracy in the West was a mistake.Most Indians would surely disagree that they are culturally unsuited to democracy – as would modern Japanese, Taiwanese or South Koreans. It makes a certain sense to speak of Asian values in Singapore, because it would be disrespectful to the Malay and Indian minorities to justify their subservience by invoking Chinese values.Lee's premise, from which he never departed, was that, especially in a multiethnic society such as Singapore, a meritocratic elite must impose social harmony from above.
Countering the race card in America
The limits of mass protest in a dictatorship
The democratic path that China never adopted
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE