Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
terrorism has mystical powersAs it turns out, the first time I described the enemy as "radical Islam" was in a column I wrote days after 9/11 . I used the phrase "radical Islamic terrorism" in another column later that month. Obama has often spoken about the problems of extremism in Islam.Obama and Clinton have chosen not to specifically and directly describe the enemy as "radical Islam" out of deference to the many Muslim countries and leaders who feel it gives the terrorists legitimacy.Most important, however, fighting this terrorist group is not the same as fighting radical Islam. Strangely, after the Republican candidates boldly and correctly described the enemy as an ideology – which is much broader than one group – they spoke almost entirely about fighting that one group. The enemy is radical Islam, an ideology that has spread over the last four decades – for a variety of reasons – and now infects alienated young men and women from across the Muslim world.
It’s time for Congress to curb the powers of the president
Everywhere, there is growing backlash to populism
Urban-rural chasm defines new Western political divide
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE