Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The real lunacy of the United Kingdom's vote to leave the European Union was not that British leaders dared to ask their populace to weigh the benefits of membership against the immigration pressures it presents.A decision of enormous consequence – far greater even than amending a country's constitution (of course, the United Kingdom lacks a written one) – has been made without any appropriate checks and balances.Indeed, no one has any idea of the consequences, both for the U.K. in the global trading system, or the effect on domestic political stability.What, exactly, is a fair, democratic process for making irreversible, nation-defining decisions?For one thing, the Brexit decision may have looked simple on the ballot, but in truth no one knows what comes next after a Leave vote.What should the U.K. have done if the question of EU membership had to be asked (which by the way, it didn't)? Surely, the hurdle should have been a lot higher; for example, Brexit should have required, say, two popular votes spaced out over at least two years, followed by a 60 percent vote in the House of Commons. The U.K. vote has thrown Europe into turmoil.
The potential global impact
of a Chinese recession
The real Crazy Rich Asia: Singapore
The regional costs
of the implosion of Venezuela
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE