Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
It sidesteps the central challenge that the EU must confront and overcome. If European democracies are to regain their health, economic and political integration cannot remain out of sync. Either political integration catches up with economic integration, or economic integration needs to be scaled back. When confronted with this stark choice, member states are likely to end up in different positions along the continuum of economic-political integration. From the very beginning, Europe was built on a "functionalist" argument: Political integration would follow economic integration. It enabled economic integration to remain one step ahead of political integration – but not too far ahead.Many economists and technocrats thought Europe's governments had become too interventionist and that deep economic integration and a single currency would discipline the state.Europe could have allowed a common social model to develop alongside economic integration.The diversity of social models across Europe, and the difficulty of reaching agreement on common rules, would have acted as a natural brake on the pace and scope of integration.Today it may be too late to attempt EU fiscal and political integration.
Studying what’s driving populism
Can global rules prevent national self-harm?
An industrial policy for good jobs
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE