Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
After the French Revolution of 1789, deputies in the National Assembly who supported the revolutionary gains sat on the left, while those who opposed them and hankered after the old order of monarchy and church congregated on the right.Like Donald Trump, it was Le Pen who ran as the "voice of the people," whereas Macron, like Hillary Clinton, was depicted as a puppet of bankers, cultural elites and international plutocrats.SoWhat was good for big business – international cooperation, pan-national institutions, and openness to immigration – was not always against the interests of the evolving left-of-center parties.The old idea of a left representing the downtrodden proletariat against the interests of big business and the bourgeoisie is gone.Anti-Semites, and others with a blood-and-soil view of society, invariably see "cold-hearted bankers" (Le Pen's term for her opponent in the presidential debate) as the enemy of "the real people ... the ordinary, decent people" (Nigel Farage's words at a campaign rally for Donald Trump in Mississippi).How might this be reconciled with the interests of internationalist businessmen and bankers?
Johnson risks becoming U.K.’s enemy of the people
Countering the race card in America
The limits of mass protest in a dictatorship
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE