Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The ghastly spectacle last month of neo-Nazis marching through Charlottesville, Virginia, carrying torches and barking slogans about the supremacy of the white race, was sparked by the city's plans to remove a statue of Robert E. Lee, the leader of the Confederate army, which fought to retain slavery in the secessionist South during the American Civil War.One is tempted to assume that only people who believe in the magical power of images would wish to erase them. The sensible way to deal with monuments of the past would be to see them as artifacts of history.Many people in the U.S. South argue that Confederate monuments should be protected as mere reminders of the past, as part of a common "heritage".For many southerners, though by no means all, the Confederate cause and its monuments are still felt to be part of their collective identity.That is why statues of Gen. Lee in front of court buildings and other public places are noxious, and why many people, including southern liberals, wish to see them removed.Much of the rural south is poorer and less educated than other parts of the U.S. People feel ignored and looked down upon by urban coastal elites.
Toxic political machismo, from Mussolini to Trump
Guns and national identity in the U.S.
Moralism and the arts: The risks in judging artistic expression
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE