Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
The second is to establish identical regulatory regimes throughout the United Kingdom, including in Northern Ireland.Nevertheless, EU and U.K. negotiators are now proceeding to phase two of the Brexit process, raising the distinct possibility that they will continue to muddle through without ever resolving the phase 1 trilemma.A second agreement would establish a "standstill transition," whereby the U.K. would retain the benefits of EU membership, but also the obligations, such as contributing to the EU budget, allowing for the free movement of people, and adhering to European court rulings.For Britons in the "Remain" camp, such a transition will allow the U.K. to stay in the EU in all but name.After all, whereas all previous EU trade deals were designed to achieve convergence between the EU and a third party, an EU-U.K. deal would be geared toward preventing divergences.The big question is not whether Britain leaves the EU, he points out, but whether Britain will "still adhere to the European model" of regulation.The U.K., having formally exited the EU and given up any say in EU decisions, would still be subject to EU laws.In either case, the U.K. will hardly have taken back control.
Will Iran conflict break the West?
How Europe can become a global player
The end of
Players and pawns
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE