Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
For decades, the Western world put its faith in a well-defined and broadly accepted economic paradigm with applications at both the national and global levels.With a new paradigm having yet to emerge, the world economy faces a heightened risk of fragmentation, with already-vulnerable countries being left even further behind.The paradigm that, until recently, dominated much of economic thinking and policymaking is embodied in the so-called Washington Consensus – a set of 10 broadly applicable policy prescriptions for individual countries – and, at the international level, in the pursuit of economic and financial globalization. Deepening the economic and financial linkages among countries was viewed as the best way to deliver durable gains, enhance efficiency and productivity, and mitigate the threat of financial instability. It promised to support the positive convergence of developing and developed countries, thereby reducing both absolute and relative poverty and weakening economic incentives for illegal cross-border migration.Economies – especially Europe – need to work actively to reform a tired system of multilateral governance that increasingly lacks credibility.
Lagarde’s edge is Europe’s main opportunity
Who lost Argentina, again? Reprising a tragedy
Trade disruption symptom of
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE