Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
A high-profile United States trade delegation appears to have returned empty-handed from its mission in China.The Americans pushed for a wholesale remaking of China's industrial policies and intellectual property rules, while asking China's government to refrain from any action against Trump's proposed unilateral tariffs against Chinese exports.China, in particular, would become more "Western" in the way that it manages its economy.There are good reasons for China – and other economies – to resist the pressure to conform to a mold imposed on them by U.S. export lobbies. Those who derisively call China a "trade cheat" should ponder whether China would have been able to diversify its economy and grow as rapidly if it had become a member of the WTO before 2001, or if it had slavishly applied WTO rules since then.In the 19th century, the U.S. was in the same position in relation to the technological leader of the time, Britain, as China is today vis-a-vis the U.S. And the U.S. had as much regard for British industrialists' trade secrets as China has today for American intellectual property rights.
Studying what’s driving populism
Can global rules prevent national self-harm?
An industrial policy for good jobs
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE