Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Discussions are now underway to establish a system of joint deposit insurance for eurozone banks. Proponents of the scheme, with the European Commission and the European Central Bank taking the lead, point out that deposit insurance would avert the danger of a run on banks in times of crisis.While this is true, critics emphasize the disparity in risks, owing to the high share of bad loans on the balance sheets of banks in some countries.While the share of bad loans for banks in the stable eurozone countries is just 2 percent, the most recently published International Monetary Fund statistics, from last April, show a share of 11 percent for Ireland, 16 percent for Italy, 40 percent for Cyprus, and 46 percent for Greece.First and foremost, deposit insurance would induce irresponsible risk-taking on the part of banks.Some argue this danger no longer exists, because the ECB is now supervising European banks.It only means that an expansive European deposit-insurance scheme should not be established even after the bad loans now on banks' books are cleaned up.
Germany’s flawed energy policies
Let the British people decide on Brexit once and for all
From a no-deal Brexit
to a no-Brexit deal
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE