Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
America just finished a snarling, bitterly divisive election, and we're all puzzling over how to interpret the results. U.S. President Donald Trump, meanwhile, heads for Paris this weekend to commemorate the armistice of what historian Margaret MacMillan has called "the war that ended peace". I asked some of my historian friends to reflect on the lessons of 1918 for our postelection America. They cited some common themes: the fragility of the world order, then and now; the big, sometimes disastrous outcomes that can begin with small events at the margins; the moral hubris that dooms inflexible leaders to failure; and the humility that allows great leaders to see events through the eyes of adversaries, and thereby avert disaster.Trump in his first two years unfortunately has played the role of divider-in-chief.Trump's uncompromising style, presidential historian Evan Thomas observes, is weirdly similar to that of Woodrow Wilson, an idealistic Democratic president.Thomas notes that Trump isn't alone in regarding his political opponents as bad people.
Unlikely crusade to save capitalism from itself
Beware ‘moral hazard’ in Hong Kong
China challenge is America’s new Sputnik moment
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE