Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
What makes assessing the discipline so challenging is the very nature of the subject, which is a strange mixture of science and commonsense.The sole reason for the immediate crash may well be that the economist predicted it. An economist who is known to be able to forecast crashes with a lead time, and can demonstrate this ability, is a logical impossibility.There is no denying that serious empirical research has helped make economics the important discipline that it is today.Ailing economies and crumbling politics prompt big questions about the discipline's foundations.All science, including economics, is based on assumptions."Normal science" must continue, but it is also time to examine the theoretical foundations of the discipline.
A low, dishonest decade
Corrupt anti-corruption campaigns
language of conflict
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE