Study shows US TV news leads to major misperceptions on Iraq

WASHINGTON: The more commercial television news you watch, the more mistaken you are likely to be about key elements of the Iraq war and its aftermath, according to a major new study released here  last week.

And the more you watch Rupert Murdoch’s Fox News channel, in particular, the more likely it is that your perceptions about the war are wrong, according to the report by the University of Maryland’s Program on International Policy Attitudes (PIPA).

Based on several nationwide surveys it conducted since June in the United States with California-based Knowledge Networks, as well as the results of other polls, PIPA found that 48 percent of the American public believe that US troops had found evidence of close pre-war links between Iraq and Al-Qaeda; 22 percent that US troops had found weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq; and 25 percent that world public opinion favored going to Washington’s war with Iraq. All three are misperceptions.

The report, Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War, also found that the more misperceptions held by the respondent, the more likely it was that he or she both supported the war and depended on commercial television for news about it.

The study is likely to stoke a growing public and professional debate over why mainstream news media ­ especially the broadcast media ­ were not more skeptical about the Bush administration’s pre-war claims, particularly regarding former Iraqi president Saddam Hussein’s WMD stockpiles and ties with Al-Qaeda.

“This is a dangerously revealing study’,’ said Marvin Kalb, a former television correspondent and a senior fellow of the Shorenstein Center

on the Press, Politics and Public Policy at the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard University.

While Kalb said he had some reservations about the specificity of the questions directed at the respondents, he said that “people who have had a strong belief that there is an unholy alliance between politics and the press now have more evidence.”

Fox, in particular, has been accused of pursuing a chauvinistic agenda in its news coverage despite its motto: “We Report, You Decide.”

Overall, according to PIPA, 60 percent of the public held at least one of the three misperceptions through September. Just 30 percent of the respondents had none of those


Surprisingly, the percentage of people holding these misperceptions has actually risen slightly over the last three months. In July, for example, polls found that 45 percent of the public believed the US had found “clear evidence in Iraq that Saddam Hussein was working closely with Al-Qaeda.” In September, 49 percent believed that.

Likewise, those who believed that the US had found WMD in Iraq jumped from 21 percent in July to 24 percent in September. One in five respondents said they believed that Iraq had actually used chemical or biological weapons during the war.

In determining what factors could be behind the misperceptions, PIPA considered a number of variables in the data.

It found a high correlation between the number of misconceptions respondents held and their support for the decision.

Only 23 percent of those who held none of the three misperceptions supported the war, while 53 percent who held one misperception did so. Of those who believe that both WMDs and evidence of Al-Qaeda ties have been found in Iraq and that world opinion backed the US, a whopping 86 percent said they supported war.

More specifically, among those who believed that the US had found clear evidence of close ties between Hussein and Al-Qaeda, two-thirds held the view that going to war was the best thing to do. Only 29 percent felt that way among those who did not believe that such evidence had been found.

Another factor that correlated closely with misperceptions about the war was party affiliation, with Republicans found substantially “more likely’’ to hold misperceptions than Democrats. But support for Bush himself as expressed by whether the respondent said she or he intended to vote for him in 2004 appeared to

be even more critical factor.

Thus, the average frequency of misperceptions among respondents who planned to vote for Bush was 45 percent, while among those who plan to vote for a hypothetical Democrat candidate, the frequency averaged only 17 percent.

Asked “Has the US found clear evidence Saddam Hussein was working closely with Al-Qaeda?’’ 68 percent of Bush supporters replied affirmatively. By contrast, two of every three Democrat backers said no.

But news sources also accounted for major differences in misperceptions, according to PIPA, which asked more than 3,300 respondents since May where they “tended to get most or (their) news.” Eighty percent identified broadcast media, while 19 percent cited print media.

Among those who said broadcast media, 30 percent said two or more networks; 18 percent, Fox News; 16 percent, CNN; 24 percent, the three big networks ­ NBC (14 percent), ABC (11 percent), CBS (9 percent); and 3 percent, the two public networks, National Public Radio (NPR) and Public Broadcasting Service (PBS).

For each of the three misperceptions, the study found enormous differences between the viewers of Fox, who held the most misperceptions, and NPR/PBS, who held the fewest by far.

Eighty percent of Fox viewers were found to hold at least one misperception, compared to 23 percent of NPR/PBS consumers. All the other media fell in between. CBS ranked right behind Fox with a 71 percent score, while CNN and NBC tied as the best-performing commercial broadcast audience at 55 percent.

Forty-seven percent of print media readers held at least one misperception.

As to the number of misconceptions held by their audiences, Fox far outscored all of its rivals. A whopping 45 percent of its viewers believed all three misperceptions, while the other commercial networks scored between 12 percent and 16 percent. Only 9 percent of readers believed all three, while only 4 percent of the NPR/PBS audience did.

When the researchers broke the data down into different demographic or political groups, they still found a significant spread depending on media source. For example, the average frequency of misperceptions among self-identified Republicans was 43 percent, but for Republicans who watched Fox, it was 54 percent. The average frequency for Republicans who relied, on the other hand, on NPR/PBS was 32 percent.

PIPA found that political affiliation and news source also compound one another. Thus, 78 percent of Bush supporters who watch Fox News said they thought the US had found evidence of a direct link to Al-Qaeda, while 50 percent of Bush supporters who rely on NPR/PBS thought so.

Conversely, 48 percent of Fox viewers who said they would support a Democrat believed that such evidence had been found. But none of the Democrat backers who relied on NPR/PBS believed it.





Your feedback is important to us!

We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.

Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.

Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (

comments powered by Disqus



Interested in knowing more about this story?

Click here