Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
A recent front-page photo in the New York Times of a boatload of Syrian refugees drifting on the Mediterranean Sea beneath an enormous setting sun could not have been more apt.The Syrian Observatory for Human Rights estimates that, over the last four years, nearly 250,000 people have been killed, including more than 100,000 civilians, many of killed in horrific ways by their own government.Fortunately, the United States' foreign policy elite finally seems ready to do something to protect Syria's people. Indeed, until recently, the U.S. and most NATO countries resolutely opposed the idea.According to the U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees, 34 percent of the 137,000 people who arrived in the EU from Jan. 1 to June 29 were Syrian, with the next-largest contributor, Afghanistan, accounting for 12 percent.For Syria's many rebel groups, Assad represents the greater threat, and thus will have to be removed from power before attention can be focused on ISIS.
The reality of post-American networks
How to govern a digitally networked world
Where is U.S. foreign policy
headed after the midterm elections?
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE