Your feedback is important to us!
We invite all our readers to share with us their views and comments about this article.
Disclaimer: Comments submitted by third parties on this site are the sole responsibility of the individual(s) whose content is submitted. The Daily Star accepts no responsibility for the content of comment(s), including, without limitation, any error, omission or inaccuracy therein. Please note that your email address will NOT appear on the site.
Alert: If you are facing problems with posting comments, please note that you must verify your email with Disqus prior to posting a comment. follow this link to make sure your account meets the requirements. (http://bit.ly/vDisqus)
Even climate activists increasingly recognize that the lofty rhetoric of the global agreement to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, concluded in Paris just over a year ago, will not be matched by its promises' actual impact on temperatures. This should make us think about smart, alternative solutions.But one such alternative, geoengineering, is a solution that many people refuse to entertain. summit after climate summit has failed to affect global temperatures for a simple reason.The prevailing approach, embodied by the Paris climate agreement, requires governments to try to force immature, uncompetitive green technologies on the world.This year, for the first time, the U.S. government office that oversees federally funded climate studies is formally recommending geoengineering research.The crucial benefit of investigating geoengineering is that it offers the only way to reduce the global temperature quickly. Geoengineering can literally reduce temperatures in a matter of hours and days. The case for serious research into geoengineering is compelling.With a climate outcome as weak and costly as the one implied by the Paris agreement, such opportunities cannot arrive too soon.
Keeping spotlight on challenge
Why gross domestic product still matters
It’s cheaper to talk than to cut emissions
FOLLOW THIS ARTICLE